Ficha del juego / ROGUE BY ROGUEVault of the Void
Texto original · InglésVault of the Void is a fast-paced roguelike deckbuilder where the power is in your hands. Continuously customise your deck, crafting powerful combos and ingenious strategies. Upgrade your cards with Void Stones, infusing them with new abilities to help defeat the minions of The Void!
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
Texto original · Chino simplificado
以预览和战前改牌提高玩家主动权，构筑与回合顺序紧密相连；复杂术语与忙碌界面是主要学习阻力。
Jugabilidad principal
Peso 25 %8,5 / 10Texto original · Chino simplificado
留牌、清除换能量和延后结算威胁使出牌顺序有持续的决策价值；多种近似术语使最初几局不容易进入节奏。
Combinaciones y estrategia
Peso 25 %9,0 / 10Texto original · Chino simplificado
战前换牌与虚空石改造允许针对具体敌人重新配置，构筑会随路线调整；固定牌数也限制了极薄牌库等路线。
Rejugabilidad
Peso 20 %8,0 / 10Texto original · Chino simplificado
职业、起始牌组和挑战条件改变资源管理方式，战前调整让重复敌人仍可有不同解法；部分资深反馈认为遭遇惊喜不足。
Azar y equidad
Peso 20 %8,5 / 10Texto original · Chino simplificado
可预览敌人与路线，坏牌可换能量，威胁数值给出反应窗口，主动规避运气的手段充分；结算规则仍有反直觉之处。
Acabado y usabilidad
Peso 10 %7,0 / 10Texto original · Chino simplificado
威胁显示和可随时换牌有助于计划，但术语拥挤、心算负担和手柄界面问题在快照中反复出现，易用性尚有明显空间。
- Autor del análisis
Texto original · Chino simplificado
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- Versión analizada
Texto original · Chino simplificado
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
Alcance y limitaciones
Texto original · Chino simplificado
未进行试玩；分数是依据已收录评述与社区具体反馈作出的主观资料评测。旧反馈跨版本、部分原始材料为不可重开的本地快照；本次 Steam 核查仅确认玩法与功能，未复测平衡、性能或报告的故障是否仍存在。
Fuentes del análisis 02
- 01Material archivadoVer material externo archivado ↓
Texto original · Chino simplificado
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 1 (2023), Tier list Part 2 (2024) 的具体优缺点，以及 玩家好评、玩家批评 与 资料核查说明；不使用旧等级、外部分数或销量反推。
- 02Fuente webVer original ↗
Texto original · Chino simplificado
Vault of the Void · Steam 官方商店
2026-10-08 访问。核对战前换牌、敌人预览、虚空石、清除换能量和威胁延后结算机制。未据介绍推定性能或故障已修复。
Reseñas en vídeo
Reseñas y análisis de YouTube y Bilibili en todos los idiomas. Abre el vídeo original para verlo.
Otras voces como referencia.
Las reseñas de terceros y los materiales de la comunidad archivados pueden corresponder a versiones diferentes. Las opiniones y notas externas se muestran por separado. Consulta los vídeos originales para conocer todo el contexto.
Resumen de la comunidad
Texto original · InglésA roguelike deckbuilder from Spider Nest Games built around planning and player agency: fixed 20-card decks, full map vision, deck swaps between fights, and Void Stone card upgrades.
Texto original · InglésPlayers rate it Very Positive on Steam (about 92% of roughly 3,000 reviews locally, 93% on the store page), and a loud minority of genre veterans call it their favourite deckbuilder, often ahead of Slay the Spire and Monster Train. Praise centres on control over RNG, build variety and depth. Critics have barely covered it: Metacritic holds one listed review (God is a Geek, 70/100) and no aggregate score. The main complaint is front-loaded complexity, a weak tutorial and a busy UI, so it is seen as a deep cut for experienced players rather than an entry point. It left Early Access (Nov 2020) for 1.0 on Oct 4 2022, then added a new class and kept updating: a Nightmare update, a Halloween update mentioned by reviewers, and The Weaver DLC on Oct 30 2025 (87% positive, 62 reviews). Mobile ports (iOS, Android) and a Switch listing exist. Steam-revenue-calculator estimates about $1.5M gross and $444k net (Boxleiter-style, not audited).
Lo que elogian los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésHigh agency over randomness: full map visibility, intent shown before enemies act, and control over draw order and card rewards
- Texto original · InglésSwapping cards in and out of your deck between fights, so builds can be tuned and rethought constantly
- Texto original · InglésFour classes plus a DLC class, each with three distinct starting decks and spells, so runs feel different from the first fight
- Texto original · InglésRetain and purge/energy systems that reward sequencing and turn-order planning
- Texto original · InglésLarge content pool: 440+ cards, 320+ artifacts, Void Stone upgrades, and 50 challenge coins with modifier-based and goofy empowered runs
- Texto original · InglésScalable difficulty, including a customisable Impossible mode, which fans of hard Slay the Spire ascensions enjoy
- Texto original · InglésCross-save between platforms, singled out by players as underrated
- Texto original · InglésReviewers say it is polished and more fleshed out than a Slay the Spire clone; one calls it a quiet technical pleasure with lots of depth
- Texto original · InglésRepeatedly called an underrated hidden gem that gets buried on Steam and rarely appears on best-of-genre lists
Lo que critican los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésSteep learning curve: around 20 mechanics arrive at once and the tutorial explains them poorly (discard vs purge vs exhaust is a common confusion)
- Texto original · InglésBusy UI with heavy mental arithmetic, which some find hurts readability
- Texto original · InglésMechanics feel more complicated than necessary just to be different from Slay the Spire (negative reviewers' view)
- Texto original · InglésMandatory 20-card deck and near-mandatory starter cards prevent thin-deck strategies and make starter cards hard to drop
- Texto original · InglésKilled enemies still deal their damage until the whole fight ends, which players find counter-intuitive
- Texto original · InglésTheme, plot and art are described as generic or bog-standard, with only serviceable visuals
- Texto original · InglésSteam Deck and controller bugs reported, including missing map art, invisible portraits and audio dropouts
- Texto original · InglésSome translation, typo and crash or save-recovery threads on the Steam forum
- Texto original · InglésSeveral reviewers, including players past Impossible 20+, find it solid but unexciting or lacking variety, and prefer Slay the Spire or Monster Train
Características distintivas
- Texto original · InglésFixed 20-card deck that you can restructure between every fight, instead of an ever-growing deck
- Texto original · InglésRetained cards can be deleted for energy or mana on later turns
- Texto original · InglésFull map vision plus enemy previews before battle, reducing hidden-information gambles
- Texto original · InglésVoid Stones and runes inserted into cards as a customisation layer, alongside potions, relics and spells
- Texto original · InglésReset-fight option to brute-force a puzzle or undo a mistake
- Texto original · InglésThe Weaver DLC class commands a team of 25+ pets across five slots with Weave and Unravel mechanics
Opiniones divididas
- Texto original · InglésComplexity: fans call it depth and a rewarding puzzle, detractors call it needless and unintuitive
- Texto original · InglésDeck-swapping and heavy agency: praised as fixing RNG frustrations, disliked as removing tension and adding micromanagement
- Texto original · InglésArt and theme: some rate the art style good to great while others call the presentation generic
Repetición y obstáculos
- Texto original · InglésLearning the dense keyword system in the first runs, which some bounced off (several recommend the free demo first)
- Texto original · InglésConstant deck micromanagement between fights, which some players find unappealing
- Texto original · InglésMental maths and planning overhead on every turn
- Texto original · InglésStarter-card dependence makes deck-building feel less free than in Slay the Spire
- Texto original · InglésBare Bones challenge coin called out as the one unfun piece even by a 200-hour fan
Mejoras esperadas
- Texto original · InglésA better tutorial that introduces keywords gradually and explains the core mechanics in depth
- Texto original · InglésA cleaner, less cluttered UI with clearer numbers and names
- Texto original · InglésFixes for Steam Deck and controller compatibility bugs
- Texto original · InglésMore language support and localisation fixes (forum requests)
- Texto original · InglésClearer item and ability descriptions (forum reports on Zeal tree confusion and an equipment misrepresentation bug)
- Texto original · InglésSome fans single out the Bare Bones challenge coin as unfun, suggesting balance tuning
Texto original · InglésEarly Access launched Nov 20 2020; 1.0 released Oct 4 2022 on Steam (Windows, Mac) and listed on iOS, Android and Switch. Steam user reception stayed Very Positive throughout and was 90% positive over the last 30 days (only 10 reviews, so low current volume; about 28 concurrent players in local data). Critic coverage is thin: Metacritic has one review (70/100) and no aggregate, and I found no OpenCritic page (search returned 404). The developer kept supporting it: a Nightmare update, a Halloween update players were awaiting, and The Weaver DLC (Oct 30 2025, 90+ cards, 50+ artifacts, 3 challenge coins). Note: the web search budget ran out during this task, so community detail comes from Steam reviews, the Steam forum and Steam store pages, and I could not read Reddit (fetch blocked) or the God is a Geek review text (403).
Fuentes de la comunidad
- Texto original · InglésTop helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam appdata: review counts, SteamSpy owners, tags, revenue estimate ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam store page: early access and release dates, review scores, tags, DLC list ↗
- Texto original · InglésThe Weaver DLC page: release date, content, reviews ↗
- Texto original · InglésMetacritic page: one critic review (God is a Geek 70), no aggregate, few user ratings ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam forum: bug, controller/Deck, localisation and mechanic-confusion threads ↗
- Texto original · InglésEstimated gross and net revenue (Boxleiter-based) ↗
- Texto original · InglésOfficial site: platforms (Steam, iOS, Android), Nightmare update mention ↗
- Texto original · InglésOpenCritic search attempted; returned 404, no entry found ↗
Comentarios archivados del creador 2
Los resúmenes de terceros basados en subtítulos automáticos pueden contener errores de transcripción o interpretación.
Texto original · InglésTier list Part 1 (2023)
Texto original · InglésVault of the Void is a deck-building roguelike with an unusual stress-meter mechanic, where managing stress matters as much as health and higher stress brings more enemies. PepperHead says plainly that he did not like it, even though it has very positive reviews and he has played a lot of deckbuilders. He found the gameplay boring and the art and environments unappealing, and felt the game did not feel alive during card fights. He played about 10 hours and concedes that more time with different card combinations might have changed his view. He places it in high D tier and stresses that D tier means not for him rather than a bad game.
Lo que elogia el creador
- Texto original · InglésHas a unique gimmick in the stress meter, which adds a resource to manage besides health
- Texto original · InglésPretty unique design choices overall
- Texto original · InglésAcknowledges the very positive reviews and that the game may be good for others
- Texto original · InglésConcedes that discovering different card combinations might make it more interesting
Problemas señalados por el creador
- Texto original · InglésGameplay felt boring to him
- Texto original · InglésArt style disliked
- Texto original · InglésFights and the card board felt lifeless and not visually interesting
- Texto original · InglésWorld environment not visually pleasing
- Texto original · InglésStress mechanic is complicated to explain and the game is complex, which contributed to it not clicking
Observaciones de diseño
- Texto original · InglésStress meter mechanic: stress is managed like health, and higher stress means more enemies to find
- Texto original · InglésDeckbuilder with unusual design choices that set it apart from other genre entries
Texto original · InglésTier list Part 2 (2024)
Texto original · InglésVault of the Void is a fairly standard deck-building roguelike that he re-evaluated after playing it longer. He originally tried it for a few hours, disliked it and placed it in C tier, but viewer comments and his own deck-building design video research pushed him to revisit it. He now finds it really solid, with a lot of content and replayability. He moves it up to A tier (described as low A), admitting he was wrong before.
Lo que elogia el creador
- Texto original · InglésVery solid, well-executed core deck-building loop
- Texto original · InglésLots of small mechanical details that make moment-to-moment play interesting
- Texto original · InglésLarge amount of content: many cards and artifacts
- Texto original · InglésHigh replayability
- Texto original · InglésHas its own vibe despite similarity to Slay the Spire
- Texto original · InglésOne of the few deck builders without unique gimmicks that still succeeds just by doing the basics well
Problemas señalados por el creador
- Texto original · InglésLacks really unique mechanics, which is normally risky for deck builders due to Slay the Spire comparisons
- Texto original · InglésFairly similar to Slay the Spire in some aspects
- Texto original · InglésHis first impression was poor, suggesting it may not hook players quickly (he partly blames his own mood and short playtime)
Observaciones de diseño
- Texto original · InglésSucceeds through execution and content volume rather than a novel hook
- Texto original · InglésDesign lesson: a game does not always need long playtime to be good, but some games reward giving them more time, and timing/mood affects judgment
Opinión actualizada
Texto original · InglésRe-evaluation of a past game: previously placed in C tier on his last tier list after a few hours; after playing more he moves it up to a low A tier.
