Ficha del juego / ROGUE BY ROGUEBlazing Beaks
Texto original · InglésRoguelite - where too much greediness can be fatal. A colorful world with armed birds blazing their way through piles of mutants, monsters and creepy creatures. Lots of mysteries to unravel, secrets to discover and levels to explore.
Nuestra puntuación
Entra en la clasificación al evaluar las cinco dimensiones
Juego registrado. Análisis próximamente.
Este juego aún no se ha evaluado en las cinco dimensiones. Mientras tanto, consulta sus datos y el material externo.
Reseñas en vídeo
Reseñas y análisis de YouTube y Bilibili en todos los idiomas. Abre el vídeo original para verlo.
Otras voces como referencia.
Las reseñas de terceros y los materiales de la comunidad archivados pueden corresponder a versiones diferentes. Las opiniones y notas externas se muestran por separado. Consulta los vídeos originales para conocer todo el contexto.
Resumen de la comunidad
Texto original · InglésA pixel-art twin-stick roguelite where armed birds fight through randomized rooms, hauling back cursed artifacts that carry debuffs, with solo, local co-op and local PvP tournament modes.
Texto original · InglésBlazing Beaks is well liked but a niche, under-the-radar title: Steam sits at Very Positive (about 83.5% of roughly 2,600 reviews), and critics on Switch landed around 80-81. Reviewers and players praise the charm, art, music, tight controls and the risk/reward artifact loop, and it shines in local co-op. The main complaints are a lack of meaningful meta-progression, heavy RNG (weapons and artifacts), uneven balance, and a sense that runs get samey; many negative reviews come from players expecting Nuclear Throne or Enter the Gungeon depth. Several recent Steam reviewers describe the game as effectively left dead on PC, though a mod/Workshop scene exists and a dev Discord community is still described as alive. Steam owner estimates are low (under 20k by SteamSpy; about 13 concurrent players), and revenue estimates are modest (around $265k gross / $78k net per a Boxleiter-style calculator).
Lo que elogian los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésCharming, clean pixel-art style with distinct, readable characters and enemies
- Texto original · InglésRisk/reward artifact system: treasures carry debuffs (for example cannot shoot while moving) and you must survive to a shop to cash them in for a big power spike
- Texto original · InglésMusic repeatedly called out as some of the best in the genre
- Texto original · InglésTight, responsive twin-stick controls and a satisfying 'nuclear throne-like' feel
- Texto original · InglésFun local co-op for two players in story mode plus a four-player local tournament mode with five sub-modes
- Texto original · InglésEight birds with distinct stats and quirks (chicken accuracy that drops when moving, platypus extra loot, penguin cloning)
- Texto original · InglésHigh replay value through randomized rooms, items and secrets, and a looping endgame that can go on indefinitely; Steam Workshop character mods
- Texto original · InglésGood value and varied enemy behaviors; bosses need specific strategies
Lo que critican los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésLittle or no sense of meta-progression: unlocks mostly dilute the item pool and nothing builds toward a long-term goal
- Texto original · InglésHeavy RNG: weapons are scarce and random, artifacts cannot be planned around, and some runs reach the first boss with no artifacts
- Texto original · InglésBalance is uneven: some guns and artifacts are strictly worse, many items are plain HP ups, and a couple of birds (Blue Bird, Chicken) outclass others (Duck, Seagull)
- Texto original · InglésSome enemies and rooms feel unfair (for example unclear charge-up attacks, hitboxes and momentum-based movement) while bosses can feel easier than regular rooms
- Texto original · InglésUI problems: some menus cannot be used with the mouse, gamepad aiming is called imprecise, and there are remote play/focus glitches and a launch failure report
- Texto original · InglésLevels are small and repetitive with one boss type per biome; runs feel samey after several hours
- Texto original · InglésOften viewed as a weaker clone of Nuclear Throne or Enter the Gungeon
- Texto original · InglésNo online multiplayer; it is local only, and PC is Windows only
Características distintivas
- Texto original · InglésCursed-artifact economy: you carry debuffs and must reach a shop to exchange them for permanent buffs, so greed can kill you
- Texto original · InglésAnthropomorphic bird cast with per-character positive and negative traits
- Texto original · InglésCampaign plus a four-player local arena tournament in the same package
- Texto original · InglésLooping endgame that can go on indefinitely
- Texto original · InglésSteam Workshop character mod support
Opiniones divididas
- Texto original · InglésDifficulty: fans say it is fair and skill-based and you die from mistakes, detractors call it unforgiving and luck-driven
- Texto original · InglésNo meta-progression: a purist 'true roguelike' feature for some, a dealbreaker for others
- Texto original · InglésComparison to Nuclear Throne and Gungeon: some call it a great alternative, others call it worse in every way
- Texto original · InglésSolo versus co-op: best with friends, but solo experience is judged weaker by some
Repetición y obstáculos
- Texto original · InglésRuns feel samey and repetitive after a few hours because of small levels and predictable enemies
- Texto original · InglésForced RNG reliance: a good run can feel one in a million because of unfair environments
- Texto original · InglésWeak upgrade system, for example tiny percent bonuses per coin, and filler items like plain HP ups
- Texto original · InglésSteep learning curve and unforgiving difficulty; more frustrating than fun for some
- Texto original · InglésSolo play is seen by some as much less fun than co-op
- Texto original · InglésFrustration and rage moments: even fans say it can make you rage out, and players note the game depends on overcoming frustration
Mejoras esperadas
- Texto original · InglésAdd real meta-progression or goals (for example a relic checklist or a good ending for collecting everything)
- Texto original · InglésMake artifact drops more consistent, and rebalance weapons, artifacts and the weaker characters
- Texto original · InglésAdd online play or better remote-play support
- Texto original · InglésFix UI: full mouse support in menus and better gamepad aiming
- Texto original · InglésGive more control over builds or weapon upgrading rather than pure RNG
- Texto original · InglésImprove boss difficulty curve and late-game power scaling, and add more boss and level variety per biome
Texto original · InglésCritic scores (Metacritic 80 from 9 reviews on Switch, OpenCritic 81 from 11 reviews, mostly Nintendo-focused outlets) come from the console release; Metacritic user score was 7.4 from 56 ratings on the page fetched (a search snippet showed 7.9 from 37, so it may have shifted). Steam lists a May 10, 2019 release (the game had earlier 2017 roots; the Steam date was not verified as early access). Early Steam community threads show Applava promising boss and artifact rebalancing and a weapons review, but recent Steam reviewers (2026) describe the game as dead/left without updates while still praising a dev Discord. It has Steam Workshop mod support, Steam trading cards, and is also on Switch, PS4 and Epic. Price is $14.99 and it is often on sale. Note that Metacritic and OpenCritic pages could not be confirmed from Steam, which lists no Metacritic score.
Fuentes de la comunidad
- Texto original · InglésTop helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam store data: tags, review counts, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- Texto original · InglésBoxleiter-style revenue estimate ($265k gross, $78k net) ↗
- Texto original · InglésOpenCritic score 81, 11 reviews, per-outlet scores ↗
- Texto original · InglésMetacritic Switch Metascore 80, user 7.4 ↗
- Texto original · InglésNWR 9/10 review: risk/reward artifacts, local co-op, no online play, learning curve ↗
- Texto original · Inglés3DJuegos review: precise controls, little originality, no online tournament ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam balance thread: artifact drops, shop placement, boss rebalancing promised by devs ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam thread on character balance (Blue Bird and Chicken strong, Duck and Seagull weak) ↗
- Texto original · InglésSearch snippet on PS4 release, modes and debuff/cash-in mechanic (page itself returned 403) ↗
Comentarios archivados del creador 1
Los resúmenes de terceros basados en subtítulos automáticos pueden contener errores de transcripción o interpretación.
Texto original · InglésTier list Part 1 (2023)
Texto original · InglésBlazing Beaks is a top-down shooter roguelike where you play as birds with guns. Its hook is that enemies drop cursed items with only downsides, and you choose how many to carry to the shop, where they can be swapped for beneficial items. He loves the concept, art and sound design, but finds the actual game suffers from design and balance problems. He never feels powerful, dies often on first visits to new areas, and puts it in D while respecting it.
Lo que elogia el creador
- Texto original · InglésCursed-item-for-shop-exchange mechanic is a really cool concept and gimmick
- Texto original · InglésArt style is appealing
- Texto original · InglésSound design is amazing and very cute
- Texto original · InglésSome cursed items have unique, interesting negative effects
- Texto original · InglésHe respects the idea and says it is fine if others like it
Problemas señalados por el creador
- Texto original · InglésNever feels powerful or satisfying when progressing through a run
- Texto original · InglésShop items are random and often not game-changing, sometimes all useless
- Texto original · InglésOnly two to three health, so new areas usually kill you until you learn enemy attacks
- Texto original · InglésLearning patterns per new area forces restarts
- Texto original · InglésRuns feel not very impactful between characters or weapons
- Texto original · InglésCurse design got more effort than the rewards, which were underwhelming
Observaciones de diseño
- Texto original · InglésEnemies drop downside-only cursed items that you trade in at the shop for useful ones
- Texto original · InglésThe push-your-luck question of how many curses to grab before the shop
- Texto original · InglésDesign effort seemed concentrated on the curses rather than the rewards


