Ficha del juego / ROGUE BY ROGUEDon’t Starve
Texto original · InglésDon’t Starve is an uncompromising wilderness survival game full of science and magic. Enter a strange and unexplored world full of strange creatures, dangers, and surprises. Gather resources to craft items and structures that match your survival style.
Nuestra puntuación
Entra en la clasificación al evaluar las cinco dimensiones
Juego registrado. Análisis próximamente.
Este juego aún no se ha evaluado en las cinco dimensiones. Mientras tanto, consulta sus datos y el material externo.
Reseñas en vídeo
Reseñas y análisis de YouTube y Bilibili en todos los idiomas. Abre el vídeo original para verlo.
Otras voces como referencia.
Las reseñas de terceros y los materiales de la comunidad archivados pueden corresponder a versiones diferentes. Las opiniones y notas externas se muestran por separado. Consulta los vídeos originales para conocer todo el contexto.
Resumen de la comunidad
Texto original · InglésKlei Entertainment's hand-drawn, Tim Burton-flavoured wilderness survival game with permadeath, procedurally generated worlds, and no tutorial.
Texto original · InglésDon't Starve is regarded as a modern survival classic: Steam shows 'Overwhelmingly Positive' at about 96.5% across roughly 113k reviews, and critics landed in the high 70s (Metacritic 79 on PC, Generally Favorable). Praise centres on the gothic art style, the discovery-driven learning loop and the tension of permadeath. Both players and critics flag the lack of guidance and punishing early hours as the main barrier, and several say the loop turns tedious once survival is mastered. The original single-player game is effectively in maintenance mode, since Klei's content updates moved to the multiplayer Don't Starve Together. Many recent Steam reviewers, even positive ones, tell newcomers to buy DST instead, even for solo play. It is not early access; it released in full in April 2013 after an alpha/beta period.
Lo que elogian los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésDistinctive hand-drawn, Burton-esque gothic art with fluid animation, plus a gramophone-style soundtrack and strong atmosphere
- Texto original · InglésPermadeath loop where every death teaches something specific (bees, darkness, hunger), making learning itself the reward
- Texto original · InglésSurvival systems that interlock: hunger, sanity, health, seasons, day/night cycle and creature behaviour create emergent stories
- Texto original · InglésNo hand-holding; players respect that Klei kept a cohesive identity instead of chasing mainstream accessibility
- Texto original · InglésHuge replayability from randomly generated worlds, many unlockable characters with different perks, and adjustable world settings
- Texto original · InglésEverything has multiple uses (monsters can be turned against each other, even death can be exploited), which rewards experimentation
- Texto original · InglésStrong value, often very cheap on sale; expansions like Reign of Giants, Shipwrecked and Hamlet are described as near full games
Lo que critican los jugadores
- Texto original · InglésAlmost no tutorial or in-game explanation; many mechanics (bird cage for food, bunnymen hostility to meat carriers, final Adventure level in darkness) are only learnable via the wiki or trial and error
- Texto original · InglésEarly hours are brutal and feel unfair because death often comes from not knowing rules rather than player error
- Texto original · InglésLosing a long run to a hidden mechanic feels especially demoralising after dozens of hours
- Texto original · InglésAdventure mode is seen as poorly designed: fetch-quest errands across levels, then a surprise difficulty spike
- Texto original · InglésOnce you can survive indefinitely the game loses purpose and becomes chores; a common critique is weak long-term goals
- Texto original · InglésClunky real-time combat, especially clicking on moving targets with mouse and keyboard
- Texto original · InglésSome reports of crashes (e.g. loading worlds with caves via DST) and a black-screen lockup bug in recent negative Steam reviews
- Texto original · InglésSome players feel abandoned: the single-player game receives no new content while DST keeps being updated
- Texto original · InglésBase game feels dated next to Don't Starve Together (e.g. weaker crafting menu and quality of life), per reviewers who played both
Características distintivas
- Texto original · InglésSurvival-crafting game with roguelike permadeath and procedural worlds but no levelling meta-progression; the only thing you carry over is knowledge
- Texto original · InglésSanity as a third resource alongside health and hunger, with hallucinated monsters and shifting behaviour
- Texto original · InglésDarkness is lethal: night without light means death, which defines the pacing of every day
- Texto original · InglésSeasonal cycle (autumn, winter, spring, summer) each with its own threats, forcing long-term planning
- Texto original · InglésArt direction of a storybook with gothic undertones, with a cast of oddly distinct playable characters
- Texto original · InglésEmergent, systemic monster ecosystem where hostile creatures can be baited to fight each other
Opiniones divididas
- Texto original · InglésDeliberate obtuseness: fans call it rewarding discovery, detractors call it artificial difficulty (even a 7/10 PopMatters-style review called the learning process laborious)
- Texto original · InglésOriginal vs Don't Starve Together: some prefer the simpler, less bloated original, while many recommend DST even for solo play because of more content and ongoing updates
- Texto original · InglésWhether it is really a roguelike: permadeath and procedural worlds say yes, but the open-ended sandbox survival structure says otherwise
- Texto original · InglésPunishing permadeath: thrilling for some, demoralising for others as runs get longer
Repetición y obstáculos
- Texto original · InglésConstant resource gathering and base upkeep (chopping, mining, food, fuel) that becomes chores once mastered
- Texto original · InglésLearning by dying repeatedly with little carried over between runs, which some find repetitive rather than empowering
- Texto original · InglésNeeding a second monitor with a wiki open to progress efficiently
- Texto original · InglésAdventure mode fetch-quest grind across multiple levels
- Texto original · InglésSolo play can feel repetitive and unstructured; several reviewers say the game works better in multiplayer
Mejoras esperadas
- Texto original · InglésBetter in-game teaching or hinting (food values, creature behaviour) so players do not need a wiki or mods like craft pot and minimap
- Texto original · InglésClearer feedback on why a run ended so failure teaches specific lessons instead of feeling like repetition
- Texto original · InglésNew content and updates for the original game instead of leaving it behind DST
- Texto original · InglésMore mid and late-game goals beyond surviving longer, and a redesigned Adventure mode
- Texto original · InglésQuality-of-life features built into the base game that players currently get via mods (geometric placement, minimap, displayed food values)
- Texto original · InglésStability fixes for crashes and the black-screen bug
Texto original · InglésLaunched to Generally Favorable reviews (Metacritic high 70s), with critics praising the art and addictive loop and criticising the steep, poorly explained learning curve. It became a long-running Steam hit (about 96.5% positive, Steam Spy owners 2-5M, a revenue estimate of roughly 13.9M USD gross, which is a modeled figure and not audited). Klei focused later development on Don't Starve Together and released the Reign of Giants, Shipwrecked and Hamlet expansions for the original, but the base game now gets little or no new content, which feeds recent negative reviews complaining of abandonment. It is on PC, Mac, Linux, consoles, Switch and iOS. The Metacritic figures conflict between sources: Steam lists 79 for PC, while the fetched Metacritic page showed 78 and user 7.1, apparently for the PS4 edition; a PC user score could not be verified and is left null. the base-game OpenCritic figure could not be verified and is left null; the OpenCritic page fetched was for the Switch edition (80).
Fuentes de la comunidad
- Texto original · InglésTop helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- Texto original · InglésLocal Steam metadata: 96.5% positive, Metacritic 79, Steam Spy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam store page (review summary and metadata) ↗
- Texto original · InglésMetacritic page, which showed 78 critic / 7.1 user for PS4 edition and critic consensus ↗
- Texto original · InglésOpenCritic Switch edition score 80, 83% recommend ↗
- Texto original · InglésPopMatters review, 7/10, learning curve as artificial difficulty ↗
- Texto original · InglésEstimated gross/net revenue via Boxleiter method ↗
- Texto original · InglésGamesRadar review (surfaced in search; page text not retrievable) ↗
- Texto original · InglésDestructoid review (surfaced in search; fetch returned 403) ↗
- Texto original · InglésKlei forum player criticism thread (surfaced in search; fetch returned 403) ↗
- Texto original · InglésSteam community discussion (surfaced in search) ↗
Comentarios archivados del creador 1
Los resúmenes de terceros basados en subtítulos automáticos pueden contener errores de transcripción o interpretación.
Texto original · InglésTier list Part 1 (2023)
Texto original · InglésDon't Starve is a well-known survival game with roguelike elements where you build a camp and try to survive a hostile world. PepperHead admits it is the one game on the list he has barely played and says he probably should not have included it. From his limited time it was fun and challenging, though it did not grab him right away. He parks it in the middle of B tier for lack of enough experience to judge it fairly, acknowledging it could rank higher.
Lo que elogia el creador
- Texto original · InglésFun and very challenging from what he played
- Texto original · InglésLarge, grand world full of things trying to kill you
- Texto original · InglésSlowly building a camp and surviving with different weapons and tools
- Texto original · InglésClearly beloved by many players and seems to have lots of depth
Problemas señalados por el creador
- Texto original · InglésCombat is not especially interesting, though he says that is not the point
- Texto original · InglésNeeds a lot of playtime to grasp, and it did not hook him immediately
- Texto original · InglésHe lacks the experience to say much about it
Observaciones de diseño
- Texto original · InglésSurvival-focused loop where the constant goal is simply staying alive rather than combat depth
- Texto original · InglésDepth that only reveals itself after many hours of play
