Portada de DoomspireFicha del juego / ROGUE BY ROGUE
Una partida más.

Doomspire

Construcción de mazosEstrategia por turnos

Texto original · InglésDescend into the Doomspire, a fast-paced roguelike deckbuilder where every run is different. Build wild synergies, battle unique bosses, and push deeper into the tower. Easy to pick up, endlessly replayable, and built for players who love strategy with chaos.

ROGUE BY ROGUEPendiente

Nuestra puntuación

Pendiente

Entra en la clasificación al evaluar las cinco dimensiones

Pendiente

Juego registrado. Análisis próximamente.

Este juego aún no se ha evaluado en las cinco dimensiones. Mientras tanto, consulta sus datos y el material externo.

Jugabilidad principal25 %—
Combinaciones y estrategia25 %—
Rejugabilidad20 %—
Azar y equidad20 %—
Acabado y usabilidad10 %—
Método de evaluación ↗
YOUTUBE + BILIBILI / VIDEO

Reseñas en vídeo

1 vídeos

Reseñas y análisis de YouTube y Bilibili en todos los idiomas. Abre el vídeo original para verlo.

Fuentes del análisis

Otras voces como referencia.

Fuera de nuestra puntuación

Las reseñas de terceros y los materiales de la comunidad archivados pueden corresponder a versiones diferentes. Las opiniones y notas externas se muestran por separado. Consulta los vídeos originales para conocer todo el contexto.

Resumen de la comunidad

Texto original · InglésA casual single-player roguelike deckbuilder by Crater Studios, heavily modeled on Hearthstone's Dungeon Run/Solo Adventure, where you pick a faction (allegiance) and climb an endless tower of ever-harder boss fights.

Texto original · InglésDoomspire has Mixed Steam reviews (about 56% positive of roughly 160 in our data; the store page showed 54% of 139). Launch (Sep 19, 2025) was poorly received: players called it a demo-like product with a bloated random card pool, too few bosses and enemies, and an unfair difficulty wall after around floor 15. Sentiment among reviewers improved after the v1.1 Allegiance patch, which let players pick a faction with its own starting deck, and later patches; several reviews are flipped or edited from negative to positive. It is still viewed as thin on content, repetitive at depth and overpriced at $14.99 (some paid more at launch). Critic coverage is almost nonexistent: Metacritic shows a single 70 from Gamesurf, who felt it should have launched in Early Access, and no OpenCritic entry was found. It is a full release, not labeled Early Access, but it plays like one.

Lo que elogian los jugadores

  • Texto original · InglésHearthstone Dungeon Run-style loop is fun and low-stress; several reviewers say it is a good chill game after a long day
  • Texto original · InglésAllegiance (faction) system added in v1.1 gives focused starting decks and clear archetypes, widely credited as the patch that fixed the worst of launch
  • Texto original · InglésFun to discover synergies and find what is overpowered; one reviewer likes that it favors fun over balance
  • Texto original · InglésGood visuals, animations and sound for an indie; 3D heroes and blocky minions are liked by some
  • Texto original · InglésDevelopers ship frequent patches (balance, 60+ new cards, deck reshuffling, faster progression) and are seen as listening to feedback
  • Texto original · InglésProgression unlocks passives, hero skins, card backs and powers; some players sink 70 to 270+ hours
  • Texto original · InglésEasy to pick up with no city building or meta-management, just cards and depth

Lo que critican los jugadores

  • Texto original · InglésVery small content pool: only around 9 bosses, few enemy types and roughly 8 cards per faction, so runs feel samey quickly
  • Texto original · InglésEndless-run is the only mode; there is no real ending, and deep runs (depth 40+) become long, same-feeling fights against boss HP in the thousands
  • Texto original · InglésDifficulty spikes and feels rigged after roughly floor 15; AI enemies get strong stacked passives and multiplicative buffs while players get additive ones
  • Texto original · InglésHeavy RNG in offers: reviewers complain of being offered off-synergy cards and passives that dilute decks, and of clunky power cards that clog the deck
  • Texto original · InglésEnemy AI is simple (trade 1 for 1, otherwise go face) and enemies have no special mechanics, just more passives
  • Texto original · InglésMissing basic quality-of-life: no tutorial, no glossary, cannot inspect your deck or opposing passives when choosing fights, no animation speed-up
  • Texto original · InglésTechnical issues: Windows only, runs poorly on Steam Deck (about 20 fps, no controller support), a reported GPU renderer-timeout hang, and odd bugs such as a huge negative floor number
  • Texto original · InglésReports that updates wipe saved runs

Características distintivas

  • Texto original · InglésEssentially an entire game built around the Hearthstone Dungeon Run / Tavern Brawl idea, with minion-board combat instead of hand-management card play
  • Texto original · InglésFaction (allegiance) identities such as dragons, thorns/silverthorn, undead/death knight, poison and archers, each with leveled unlocks
  • Texto original · InglésEnemies and bosses use the same passives the player can unlock, so the passives you see bosses use are what you later collect
  • Texto original · InglésInfinite depth scaling where bosses get increasingly silly stats
  • Texto original · InglésDeck reshuffling so a run does not end when your deck empties (added in a late patch)

Opiniones divididas

  • Texto original · InglésPost-allegiance-patch quality: many say it is now good or decent and recommended, while others still say it feels like a demo or early access
  • Texto original · InglésDifficulty: some find it too easy once a broken combo is found (ramp bundle, silverthorn plus taunt), while others find it brutally unfair after floor 15
  • Texto original · InglésPrice: some say it is fine at current price for the content, others call $15 (or more at launch) too steep
  • Texto original · InglésMarketing: complaints that the developer spent on streamer sponsorships while the game lacked basics

Repetición y obstáculos

  • Texto original · InglésLong deep runs where every fight looks the same but bigger, with no animation speed-up; several players quit around depth 40 to 50 from boredom
  • Texto original · InglésStarting over with the same weak starting cards each run in earlier versions; progression that mostly unlocks things you already saw a boss use
  • Texto original · InglésSwitching faction requires abandoning a run
  • Texto original · InglésGrinding to unlock key passives and factions before higher floors feel manageable; about 30 achievements seen as grindy
  • Texto original · InglésConstantly having to skip offered cards because the growing unlocked pool is off-synergy

Mejoras esperadas

  • Texto original · InglésMore bosses, enemy types and cards per faction (the most repeated request, even in positive reviews)
  • Texto original · InglésAbility to buff or upgrade specific cards outside combat (items on cards, like Monster Train or Legends of Runeterra) and more ways to customize or thin a deck
  • Texto original · InglésPercentage-based or more plentiful healing, since flat heals are useless at deep floors with very large max HP
  • Texto original · InglésStarting-deck and build variety, plus a real run structure or ending, not just endless scaling
  • Texto original · InglésAnimation speed options, tutorial, glossary and deck/passive viewing during route selection
  • Texto original · InglésSteam Deck and controller support, and saves that survive updates

Texto original · InglésLaunched Sep 19, 2025 to Mixed reviews after a demo that many thought was more fun than the release. Patches per the Steam news page: v1.0.2 (Sep 22, 2025) sped progression by 37% and nerfed a passive; v1.0.3 (Oct 1) cost/undead fixes; v1.1 The Allegiance (Nov 28, 2025, per the page) added allegiances and 60+ cards and removed a boss passive; v1.1.2 (Dec 18) did a boss balance pass and added deck reshuffling; later a v1.2 (Jan 26) restoring allegiance unlocks and UI polish and a v1.3 Fire & Ice (May 4) with shared passives, scaled boss difficulty and a new arena. The fetched page's years for the later entries were garbled and likely refer to 2026. Some reviews note an earlier month-long gap without updates. Windows only; Steam Deck not supported well. Metacritic has only 1 critic and 2 user ratings so no score is shown. The Steam ratio is unlikely to move much because many reviewers update after patches but the overall total is small (about 160).

Comentarios archivados del creador 1

Los resúmenes de terceros basados en subtítulos automáticos pueden contener errores de transcripción o interpretación.

Texto original · InglésTier list Part 5 (2026)

Texto original · InglésDoomspire is a Hearthstone-style deck-building roguelike that tries to recapture Hearthstone's PvE modes such as Catacombs. Between fights you pick cards, passives and removals, but the game pushes only a few builds and is badly unbalanced. He describes infinite loops, ramping so strong a turn-one full board is routine, and thin enemy and content variety. He thinks the developers did not play enough Hearthstone or deckbuilders. He creates a D tier just for it, the only game placed there.

Lo que elogia el creador

  • Texto original · InglésRespects the amount of work that went into it
  • Texto original · InglésHearthstone-like core (mana, trading minions, hero damage) is straightforward and readable
  • Texto original · InglésGenerous reward choices between fights: cards, passives, card removal
  • Texto original · InglésPremise of reviving beloved Hearthstone PvE/Catacombs-style play is appealing

Problemas señalados por el creador

  • Texto original · InglésExtremely unbalanced; builds like plants are broken and can go infinite
  • Texto original · InglésVery few viable builds, with only a handful of good cards per archetype
  • Texto original · InglésRamping is even stronger than in Hearthstone and duplicating passives breaks the game
  • Texto original · InglésFew enemies with repetitive decks; needs roughly three times the content
  • Texto original · InglésEach enemy has many passives that are tedious to read, unlike Hearthstone's single impactful hero power
  • Texto original · InglésNo real events; rewards feel like the same shop every time
  • Texto original · InglésVisuals are weak and generic standard fantasy

Observaciones de diseño

  • Texto original · InglésLets you duplicate passives, which he finds absurdly exploitable (stacking extra starting mana)
  • Texto original · InglésDesign lesson: one big, readable passive per enemy (as in Hearthstone PvE) gives fights identity and strategy
Ver vídeo original ↗