게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUECaves of Qud
원문 · 영어Inhabit a deeply-simulated science fantasy world and chisel through layers of thousand-year-old civilizations. Build a character from over a hundred mutations and cybernetics. The award-winning sandbox roguelike & RPG full of robots, deep lore, and sentient plants.
이 점수의 이유는?
원문 · 중국어 간체
本体系最看重其能真正改变解法的角色与世界系统；高构筑和复玩分并不掩盖信息表达与入门风险的短板。
핵심 게임플레이
가중치 25%8.5 / 10원문 · 중국어 간체
根据资料评估：回合探索允许以战斗、能力和关系解决问题，系统反馈能产生连续的角色扮演决策；大量规则学习影响入门节奏。
- 평가자
원문 · 중국어 간체
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- 평가한 버전
원문 · 중국어 간체
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
평가 범위와 한계
원문 · 중국어 간체
基于收录评论与官方产品说明的主观资料评测，未试玩；原始玩家评论及所有补丁未逐条重新核验。未完成实机长线通关；关于系统深度的判断来自官方规则和多条收录案例，UI 与死亡反馈是历史资料评价。
평가 근거 자료 02
- 01보관 자료보관된 외부 자료 보기 ↓
원문 · 중국어 간체
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的具体玩法优缺点（Tier list Part 5 (2026)）以及 玩家好评与批评；只引用这些资料的具体反馈，不采纳旧等级或外部分数。
- 02웹 자료원문 보기 ↗
원문 · 중국어 간체
Caves of Qud — Steam 官方商店页
2026-10-08 访问。确认了物理环境交互、完整角色能力与身体、阵营关系、突变植入体，以及 Classic/Roleplay/Wander/Daily 模式。该页不作为实测性能或缺陷已修复的证据。
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A deeply systemic, turn-based science-fantasy sandbox roguelike/RPG from Freehold Games (published by Kitfox), set in a strange post-apocalyptic world with mutations, cybernetics, factions and a handcrafted main quest inside a procedurally generated map.
원문 · 영어Caves of Qud is received as a landmark of the genre: Steam shows Overwhelmingly Positive (about 95% of roughly 12.7k reviews), Metacritic is 91 from 8 critics, and OpenCritic has a top critic average of 90 with 90% recommending. It left early access on 5 Dec 2024 (Kitfox became publisher in 2023) after roughly nine years of weekly updates, and adds a new graphical UI, the final stretch of the main quest, and later a Switch port (Feb 2026). It won the 2025 IGF Excellence in Narrative award and the 2025 Hugo for Best Game or Interactive Work. Praise centres on writing, worldbuilding and freedom of build and play; the recurring complaints are a steep learning curve, unclear interface and information, unfair-feeling deaths and debuffs, and the claim that its 'depth' is more build variety than true simulation. Players who bounce off it tend to bounce hard.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Worldbuilding and prose: item, place and creature descriptions are poetic and strange, with heavy Gene Wolfe (Book of the New Sun) flavour, and make the world feel ancient and mysterious
- 원문 · 영어Huge build variety: over a hundred mutations and cybernetics, true-kin vs mutant castes, and many playstyles (psychic, tinker, sniper, multi-armed brawler, etc.)
- 원문 · 영어Emergent, absurd stories: befriending or recruiting hostile creatures, turning into odd things, making a serial killer a companion, all through interacting systems
- 원문 · 영어Everything can be talked to and belongs to a faction, so reputation and relationships feel consequential and the world feels inhabited
- 원문 · 영어Handcrafted main quest and lore woven into a procedurally generated map, plus nearly a million explorable maps
- 원문 · 영어Distinctive pixel-art and eerie soundtrack identity; the 1.0 graphical UI and controller support (runs well on Steam Deck) improved accessibility
- 원문 · 영어Tons of content and replay value, with players logging hundreds of hours; classic vs roleplay (save-friendly) modes and Steam Workshop mods
- 원문 · 영어Critics call it a genre-defining achievement in roleplaying freedom and flexibility
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Steep, vertical learning curve: barebones tutorial, many systems and keys to learn, and players often need the wiki to progress
- 원문 · 영어UI/UX legibility problems: low-contrast tiles, hard to tell actors from items, message-log spam, fluid splatter obscuring the map, clunky keybind and settings menus and a weak mouse interface
- 원문 · 영어Deaths can feel unfair or opaque: one-shots from off-screen enemies, unreliable threat information, rest not interrupting when attacked, autoexplore walking into harm
- 원문 · 영어Crippling permanent and temporary debuffs (diseases, fungal infections, limb loss) that the game explains poorly, often pushing players to reload saves
- 원문 · 영어Procedural generation sometimes yields incoherent or blocked spaces, enclosed rooms, teleport-plant traps, and a 'getting lost' overland mechanic some find punishing
- 원문 · 영어Faction reputation rules can produce arbitrary-feeling penalties, such as killing a hostile legendary creature angering a friendly town
- 원문 · 영어Some critics of the 'depth' hype say NPCs are flavour-text cardboard cutouts and the simulation is shallower than Dwarf Fortress-style comparisons suggest
- 원문 · 영어Prose can turn word-salad or over-pretentious to some readers and hinder clarity of ability descriptions
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어A science-fantasy post-apocalypse setting with a literary, Wolfe-inspired voice rather than generic fantasy or dungeon-crawl tropes
- 원문 · 영어Deep simulation sandbox rules: nearly any object or creature can be interacted with, recruited, dismantled, or converted (memed 'you can become a chair')
- 원문 · 영어Mutations plus cybernetics character creation with true-kin and mutant paths, unmatched in breadth among traditional roguelikes
- 원문 · 영어Procedurally generated world history and sultan legends that feed into a fixed main story
- 원문 · 영어Faction and reputation system that governs who is hostile or friendly across the entire map
- 원문 · 영어Classic (permadeath) and roleplay (saveable) modes letting one game serve both hardcore and story-focused players
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Whether 'depth' means systemic simulation (critics say it is mostly build variety and scripted weirdness) or rich, interconnected worldbuilding (fans say it is unmatched)
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty and permadeath: loved as consequential and funny by fans, called opaque and hostile by detractors, with many preferring the roleplay mode
- 원문 · 영어Writing style: hailed as the best prose in games by some, labelled pretentious or word-salad by others
- 원문 · 영어Graphics and UI: the minimalist pixel look is praised as distinctive, but readability complaints are common even among positive reviewers
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Reputation grinding and hunting random legendaries or villages to befriend or slay is described as un-fun but effectively required for endgame survivability
- 원문 · 영어Cloning shopkeepers and scouring for loot is called boring intended cheese in one long-time player's review
- 원문 · 영어Autoexplore and bumping weak enemies early, then slogging across big empty overland regions, feels repetitive to some
- 원문 · 영어Dealing with diseases and permanent injuries by reloading or consulting the wiki
- 원문 · 영어Combat that some say becomes shallow or boring after the first 10-15 hours, plus an extremely long time investment before the game clicks
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Better onboarding: fuller tutorial, in-game explanations of debuffs, diseases and how to cure them, and labelled controls
- 원문 · 영어Improve visual clarity: contrast, distinguishing items and merchants, reducing message spam and fluid clutter, more accurate ability descriptions and damage numbers
- 원문 · 영어Better keybinding and settings UX and more capable mouse support (comparison made to Tales of Maj'Eyal)
- 원문 · 영어Improve map generation validation so interiors connect and the player is not trapped, and reduce movement- and sight-blocking clutter
- 원문 · 영어Rebalance character options: tinker and some mutations or classes seen as weak, psychic powers as strong, true-kin vs mutant imbalance and the ease of breaking the game late
- 원문 · 영어Make the faction reputation system and legendary-creature rules more coherent and less grind-dependent, and add more variety to the main quest across runs
원문 · 영어Development began in 2007, a public beta came in 2010, and Steam early access in 2015 with consistent weekly updates for about nine years. Early access reviewers praised depth but found the interface confusing; Kitfox Games became publisher in July 2023 and the 1.0 release on 5 Dec 2024 added a new fully graphical UI and the last leg of the main quest, then drew universal acclaim (Metacritic 91). A Nintendo Switch port followed on 16 Feb 2026 (Nintendo Life 8/10). Awards: 2025 IGF Excellence in Narrative, 2025 Hugo for Best Game or Interactive Work; nominated for 2025 Golden Joysticks Best Indie Game and a D.I.C.E. Strategy/Simulation nomination. Platforms: Windows, macOS, Linux (Steam, GOG), Switch; Steam price $29.99 with Workshop mod support (GOG reviewers note mod restrictions vs Steam). Steam recent reviews (~94% positive over 30 days) remain strong as of late Sep 2026. Steam-side estimates (SteamSpy owners 200k-500k; steam-revenue-calculator gross about $12.1M, net to developer about $3.6M) are rough Boxleiter-style estimates, not audited. Note: the WebSearch budget was exhausted in this session, so no Reddit threads were read directly (Reddit and Eurogamer fetches were blocked); community detail comes from 18 negative and top positive Steam reviews plus Metacritic, OpenCritic, Wikipedia, GOG and Steam pages.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam metadata: app id 333640, review counts, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metascore 91 from 8 critics, user score 8.1 from 49 ratings, per-outlet scores ↗
- 원문 · 영어Top critic average 90, 90% recommend, 11 reviews, outlet scores ↗
- 원문 · 영어Development history, awards (IGF, Hugo), Switch port, reception notes ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam page: Overwhelmingly Positive, 1.0 release notes, tags ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam community top-rated reviews summary: atmosphere, emergent stories, balance and difficulty gripes ↗
- 원문 · 영어GOG page: price, 4/5 user rating, critic quotes, modding note ↗
- 원문 · 영어Estimated gross revenue about $12.09M and net about $3.57M (Boxleiter method) ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 5 (2026)
원문 · 영어Caves of Qud is a turn-based traditional roguelike with a huge, freeform RPG campaign and deep lore, often compared to D&D and Dwarf Fortress. He says it demands patience and commitment, the text-style visuals will repel some players, and it is hard, with the advice to use the non-permadeath storyteller mode. He has only put in a small fraction of the hours fans recommend, so he finds it hard to judge. Many would put it in S, but he places it in low A for now, with a possible re-evaluation once he finishes the main quest.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Massive, open-ended RPG adventure with many ways to approach everything
- 원문 · 영어Very long main quest campaign
- 원문 · 영어Strong replayability from drastically different classes and races
- 원문 · 영어Deep lore and strong world-building focus
- 원문 · 영어Rewards experimentation and mastering its mechanics; could be a 'one game for a year' pick
- 원문 · 영어Considered by many one of the best traditional roguelikes
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Visuals are limited and hard to grasp, and can put many players off
- 원문 · 영어Needs lots of patience and commitment to learn
- 원문 · 영어Tutorial is small relative to the game's depth and it does not hold your hand
- 원문 · 영어Hard, with easy deaths from experimenting; default hardcore permadeath is punishing
- 원문 · 영어Heavy reading and freedom can feel intimidating
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Extreme freedom: no single way to do anything, closer to tabletop D&D than most roguelikes
- 원문 · 영어Storyteller mode lets players avoid permadeath while experimenting
- 원문 · 영어Character classes and races differ drastically, driving replay value
- 원문 · 영어Limited visuals lean on player imagination, which is part of the charm for fans
변경된 의견
원문 · 영어Provisional placement: he says many would put it in S and he may re-evaluate after beating the game; he is only about halfway through the main adventure.
