Карточка игры / ROGUE BY ROGUEAcross the Obelisk
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSet forth in a co-op roguelite deckbuilder where every choice matters! Craft decks of breathtaking power. Journey alone or with up to three friends. Plot your party’s path to glory and face powerful enemies in deep tactical combat on your quest to save the kingdom of Senenthia in Across the Obelisk!
Почему такая оценка?
Командная синергия и выбор маршрута четырех колод очень глубоки, за счет бремени управления одиночной игрой, сужения баланса и проблем стабильности сотрудничества на снимках.
Машинный перевод резюме. Оригинальная оценка и источники сохранены ниже.
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
四套牌的团队协同与路线选择很有深度，代价是单人管理负担、平衡收窄和快照中的合作稳定性问题。
Основной игровой процесс
Вес 25 %8,0 / 10Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
四人队伍回合协作和分工有明确策略乐趣；单人同时管理四套牌增加决策负担和节奏停顿。
Сборки и стратегия
Вес 25 %8,5 / 10Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
职业分工、制卡升级与状态协同提供丰富准备空间，但叠加增减益的优势挤压非主流组合。
Реиграбельность
Вес 20 %8,0 / 10Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
分支事件、职业选项与不同模式会改变路径，固定战役结构也让部分后续局趋于熟悉。
Случайность и справедливость
Вес 20 %7,0 / 10Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
队伍和牌组可提前配置，降低随机发牌的无助感；明显强弱路线和 DLC 能力膨胀削弱选择均等性。
Качество исполнения и удобство
Вес 10 %6,0 / 10Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
快照记载合作不同步、拖牌崩溃和分辨率重置，锁定奖励提示与复杂选人界面增加阻力。
- Автор обзора
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- Оценённая версия
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
Область оценки и ограничения
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
基于收录资料与官方页面的主观归纳，未进行试玩。资料覆盖多个 DLC 时期，未复现合作故障；只评价 DLC 提示和选择受限对玩法的影响，不按价格或发行商争议扣分。
Источники обзора 02
- 01Архивные материалыОткрыть архив внешних материалов ↓
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 1 (2023) 及 玩家好评与批评 中的机制、交互、重复与易用性反馈；未将外部分数或旧等级用于计算。
- 02Интернет-источникОткрыть оригинал ↗
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
Across the Obelisk 官方产品说明
2026-10-08 访问。确认四英雄单人/合作、职业组合、可升级卡牌与分支事件，以及独立随机草拟模式。 官方页面不单独证明平衡或稳定性。
Видеообзоры
Обзоры и разборы на YouTube и Bilibili на любых языках. Откройте оригинал, чтобы посмотреть видео.
Другие мнения для справки.
Архивные сторонние обзоры и материалы сообщества могут относиться к разным версиям. Внешние мнения и оценки представлены отдельно. Полный контекст доступен в исходных видео.
Обсуждения игроков
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийA co-op (1-4 player) roguelite deckbuilder/RPG by Dreamsite Games where you run a party of four heroes through a branching campaign map, crafting decks and stacking buffs against tactical enemies.
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSteam shows Mostly Positive (about 80% of roughly 13,000 reviews). The base game is widely loved for its depth, co-op and replayability, and critics who reviewed it were favourable (3.5/5 to 4/5, 7/10 to 8.5/10) but noted that it is a solid genre entry rather than a genre great. The dominant recent complaint, in the most helpful negative reviews, is not the gameplay but Paradox's DLC monetisation: pricey DLC, locked DLC nodes and cards appearing in the base game, plus ongoing bugs and desyncs. It is not abandoned (a DLC-heavy release cadence continues), but several long-time players say meaningful free content and fixes have dried up and there is no sequel or mod support.
Что хвалят игроки
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийVery deep deck and party customisation: 16 base heroes across four roles, 500+ cards and 300+ items, with card crafting/upgrading and traits that enable many builds
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCo-op is a standout: each player controls a hero, which spreads the deck-building load and makes it a rare strong multiplayer deckbuilder; players report 250+ hours with friends
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийHuge replayability from branching map paths, events with hero-specific options, Madness difficulty levels, extra modes and sandbox
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDistinctive art style and appealing original cast; lighthearted tone
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBig amount of content in the base game (100+ hours to see it all per multiple reviewers), so the $20 base is considered good value
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMeta-progression (unlocking cards, perks, heroes and their mini-quests) keeps runs feeling rewarding
Что критикуют игроки
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийAggressive DLC monetisation since the Paradox takeover: some DLC costs as much as the base game for a small amount of content, and new characters/skins are priced separately; full set is often quoted around $90+
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDLC content is baked into the map and card pools: flashing DLC-locked nodes that lead to a purchase prompt, and DLC cards offered as dead, unselectable rewards in the base game
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийStability problems: long-standing random crashes, reset resolution, and desyncs in co-op (card dragging, boss tactics, shopping) reported after newer DLC
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBalance is lopsided: buff/debuff stacking and scaling builds dominate, raw-damage and off-meta comps (e.g. 3 healers or 3 scouts) struggle, and some heroes have clearly optimal paths
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCampaign acts are largely fixed, so it is only semi-random; some players feel it is easier than Slay the Spire and lacks true roguelite variance
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийPerceived lack of effort on the base game: no mod support and little substantial free content for years, with calls for a properly reworked sequel
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCharacter select UI redesign seen as clunky, and attempts to push the Paradox launcher drew complaints
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRecent DLC is criticised for heavy power creep, a clash in art style and arbitrary design that do not mesh with the base game, while the game is also described as having received no meaningful content for about 4 years
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийParadox-era business practices beyond DLC price: an unnecessary launcher and complaints about data collection, cited by long-time players (hundreds of hours) as the reason they no longer recommend the game
Отличительные особенности
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOne of the first multiplayer roguelike deckbuilders, with every player piloting their own hero and deck
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийParty-of-four RPG structure with Darkest Dungeon-style hero roles (warrior, scout, mage, healer) combined with Slay the Spire-style card play
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEnergy carries over between turns (up to 10) rather than resetting, and heroes have equipment, traits and player-level perks
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCard crafting and upgrading with shards at the start of each act, plus hero unlock mini-quests and Obelisk corruption challenges
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBranching campaign map with persistent, semi-fixed content and Madness difficulty levels and sandbox modifiers
Спорные моменты
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийWhether the DLC is fair: some say it is optional, improving over time and worth buying on sale; others say it feels predatory and unavoidable because the holes show in the game
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDifficulty and roguelite-ness: some find it easier and more controllable than Slay the Spire, which they like, while others find the fixed maps and stacking too easy
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийWhether it beats Slay the Spire: a few prefer it, others say it does some things better and some worse
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийWhether the base game alone is worth $20 without DLC: many say yes, at least one reviewer with 300 hours says no
Повторы и неудобства
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEarly-game grind: starting heroes are weak with limited deckbuilding until enough cards and heroes are unlocked, which one reviewer called a long and painful early game
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBuilding a deck solo takes a long time; several players recommend at least 2 players
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийConstant reminders of missing DLC (flashing exclamation marks, locked characters) interrupting play
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRuns can become stale after a long time since acts are fixed and buff stacking trivialises content
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBug-related interruptions such as crashes and desyncs, and the Paradox launcher push
Ожидаемые улучшения
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBundle or cut prices of DLC, or make updates free, and stop promoting DLC inside the base game's map and card rewards
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийStop showing unselectable DLC cards in reward screens for non-owners
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийFix persistent crashes and co-op desyncs with proper testing before DLC releases
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRebalance so that more than buff-stacking builds are viable and early-game starting heroes are less limited
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийAdd mod support and more free base-game content or a true sequel focused on core cards and classes
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийImprove the character-select UI so all hero info can be seen without scrolling
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLaunched into Steam early access in 2021 (GamingOnLinux covered it in April 2021) and released 1.0 on Aug 16, 2022, praised as an engrossing co-op deckbuilder, with early balance and grind complaints. Publisher Paradox (Arc) took over and the game now has many DLC packs (Sands of Ulminin, Shores of Sahti, Sigrun the Valkyrie, Bernard the Alchemist and others); recent reviews skew negative about DLC monetisation even from long-time fans, dragging the overall rating to around 80%. Also on Switch and PlayStation/Xbox. Metacritic has no Metascore yet (it needs 4 critic reviews; only 2 shown), and OpenCritic lists 4 reviews without a displayed aggregate in what I could fetch. Revenue and owner numbers are third-party estimates, not audited.
Источники сообщества
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийTop helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSteam store data: review summary, tags, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSteam store page ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOpenCritic critic list: Screen Rant, PCMag, Capsule Computers, Thumb Culture ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMetacritic user score 7.1 from 14 ratings, Softpedia 85 and PCMag 70, no Metascore yet ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOpenCritic review excerpts surfaced by search (strengths and early grind) ↗
- Оригинальный текст · Английский2021 early-access coverage of the co-op deckbuilder (via search result only) ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCo-op listing for the game (via search result) ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSteam community discussion on balance and early game (via search summary) ↗
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRevenue estimate based on Boxleiter method ↗
Архив мнений автора 1
Сторонние пересказы на основе автоматических субтитров могут содержать ошибки расшифровки или интерпретации.
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийTier list Part 1 (2023)
Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийAcross the Obelisk is a co-op-style deck-building roguelike where you control four characters at once. PepperHead uses it as the first deck builder of the list and talks about how the genre shares common gimmicks, so each game must build its own identity. He finds it complex and overwhelming for newcomers, but praises its engaging overworld and charming presentation. He rates it a solid A tier while cautioning that it is not for people new to deck builders.
Что хвалит автор
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийControlling four characters at once is its unique hook
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOutside-of-combat world and exploration feel engaging and immersive, like a real adventure
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийCute, fun art and animations, more lively than typical minimalistic deck-builder animations
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMany characters, cards and build possibilities once you have played a few hours
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийGood balance between combat gameplay and the overworld/events layer
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOne of the best deck-building games in his view
Проблемы, отмеченные автором
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийPretty complicated with a lot of information, overwhelming for beginners
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийManaging four characters and their placement adds to the overload
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийNot recommended if you are not used to deck-building games
Наблюдения о дизайне
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийFour characters played simultaneously, with placement management a big part of play
- Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDesign lesson: deck builders need a good balance between card combat and the outside world; this one nails the outside world
