Обложка игры Into the BreachКарточка игры / ROGUE BY ROGUE
Ещё один забег.

Into the Breach

Пошаговая стратегияСтратегия и тактика

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийControl powerful mechs from the future to defeat an alien threat. Each attempt to save the world presents a new randomly generated challenge in this turn-based strategy game.

ROGUE BY ROGUEV1

Наша оценка

90,3/ 100
Разделённое место #01
Наш обзор / RBR V1

Почему такая оценка?

Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

公开敌方意图让位置决策与复盘非常扎实,是本批随机与公平维度的高分参照;入门说明仍可改进。

01

Основной игровой процесс

Вес 25 %9,5 / 10
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

推拉、挡出生点与保护建筑把每个回合压缩成高密度位置问题,少量规则能产生多种有代价的解法。

Источники01 ↗02 ↗
02

Сборки и стратегия

Вес 25 %9,0 / 10
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

机甲功能、驾驶员与武器升级互相约束,目标是保护电网而非单纯堆伤,资源选择有明确意义。

Источники01 ↗02 ↗
03

Реиграбельность

Вес 20 %8,5 / 10
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

不同小队、任务目标与地图位置改变解题方式;长期仍围绕相同保护结构,变化有边界。

Источники01 ↗
04

Случайность и справедливость

Вес 20 %9,5 / 10
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

官方明确预告敌方攻击,快照确认主要命中结果可预判;困难局面仍可能必须承受电网损失。

Источники01 ↗
05

Качество исполнения и удобство

Вес 10 %8,0 / 10
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

短战斗与暂停思考方便分段游玩,界面紧凑;教程较薄、威胁层次不易读增加新手学习成本。

Источники01 ↗
Автор обзора
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测
Оценённая версия
Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский
具体构建未知;以所引资料描述的版本为准

Область оценки и ограничения

Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

基于收录资料与官方页面的主观归纳,未进行试玩。资料包含 Advanced Edition 小队与挑战,未逐一求解随机棋盘;高公平分不表示每局都能无损完成。

Источники обзора 02

  1. 01
    Архивные материалы
    Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

    收录评论与社区资料(2026-10-01 快照)

    使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 2 (2024) 及 玩家好评与批评 中的机制、交互、重复与易用性反馈;未将外部分数或旧等级用于计算。

    Открыть архив внешних материалов ↓
  2. 02
    Интернет-источник
    Оригинальный текст · Упрощённый китайский

    Into the Breach 官方产品说明

    2026-10-08 访问。确认敌方攻击预告、保护城市、机甲武器与驾驶员,以及 Advanced Edition 新任务与小队。 官方页面不单独证明平衡或稳定性。

    Открыть оригинал ↗
YOUTUBE + BILIBILI / VIDEO

Видеообзоры

Видео: 2

Обзоры и разборы на YouTube и Bilibili на любых языках. Откройте оригинал, чтобы посмотреть видео.

Источники обзора

Другие мнения для справки.

Не влияет на нашу оценку

Архивные сторонние обзоры и материалы сообщества могут относиться к разным версиям. Внешние мнения и оценки представлены отдельно. Полный контекст доступен в исходных видео.

Обсуждения игроков

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийA turn-based tactics roguelite from Subset Games (makers of FTL) where you pilot a squad of three mechs on tiny 8x8 grids to protect city buildings from insectoid Vek, with every enemy attack telegraphed in advance.

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийInto the Breach is treated as a modern classic of the tactics and roguelite space. Critics gave it a Metacritic score of 90 on PC (89 on Switch), and it won Best Strategy Game at The Game Awards 2018, among other awards. Steam players agree, with about 94% positive across roughly 22,400 reviews (Very Positive). The praise centres on perfect-information combat, compact puzzle-like turns and squad variety. The main dissent is from players who find it more of a rigid puzzle game than a tactics game, and from those who still feel unavoidable spawn RNG can doom a run. It is not early access or abandoned. The free Advanced Edition update shipped in July 2022 alongside the Netflix mobile release, and players still ask for more content or a sequel.

Что хвалят игроки

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEnemy attacks are telegraphed, so there are no hit-chance rolls. Losses feel like your own mistakes, which reviewers often contrast with XCOM.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEach turn is a self-contained micro-puzzle: pushing, pulling, blocking spawns and redirecting attacks, with depth coming from very simple rules.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийProtecting the Power Grid (city buildings) rather than just killing everything is a fresh objective that changes how you evaluate every move.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLarge variety of mech squads, pilots and weapon upgrades. Each squad teaches a different way to think about the game, and squad achievements hint at how to play them.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийShort runs and short battles (roughly 10-15 minutes each) make it easy to pick up and put down, and it works well on Steam Deck and with a gamepad.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEconomy of design: small maps, no filler, clean pixel art and a well-regarded soundtrack by Ben Prunty.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDifficulty ramps gradually, with Easy through Unfair settings, so players report steadily improving on squads that once beat them.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRuns are short enough that a blunder costs about 3 hours rather than a 15-hour XCOM-style campaign.

Что критикуют игроки

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSome players say it plays like a rigid puzzle game rather than a tactical one, with the board state mattering more than player choice.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEnemy spawn positions and targeting can create situations that feel unwinnable without grid damage, especially on the first turn of a mission or in the final island.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLosing a run discards upgrades. Some players find the penalty harsh when a poor upgrade choice only shows up an hour later.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMissions share the same core puzzle despite varied objectives, and some players report repetitiveness after a while.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийThe tutorial is thin and the legibility of threats and solutions is hard for newcomers, who often need external guides.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийThe unlock system (squads and pilots tied to achievements) is criticised by some as an FTL-style chore.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSteep difficulty: several negative reviewers say even Normal wipes them out repeatedly and the game is not for players who dislike punishing roguelikes.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLegibility of puzzles is hard: players struggle to tell whether a bad board needs a tradeoff or was set up wrong at the start.

Отличительные особенности

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийFully deterministic combat with visible enemy intentions: a tactics game built like a chess puzzle.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийHealth bar is the city Power Grid, so victory means damage mitigation rather than total elimination.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийTime-travel framing: losing a run sends a chosen pilot back into a new timeline with their experience, giving a light meta-progression.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийEnemy and environmental interactions such as water, ice, fire and mountains are central, and enemies can kill or block each other.
  • Оригинальный текст · Английский8x8 boards and five-turn missions give it a compactness unlike XCOM-style or Fire Emblem-style tactics games.

Спорные моменты

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийWhether the RNG is a problem: fans say the game is essentially deterministic, while critics say spawns and targeting can make puzzles unsolvable.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийPuzzle versus tactics: some see it as a perfect blend, others feel it lacks the tactical freedom they wanted.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDifficulty: some beat Unfair, others report never finishing Normal.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRun length and permadeath: fans value short restarts, detractors dislike losing progress.

Повторы и неудобства

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийRestarting entire runs after a late failure, with upgrades lost.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийUnlocking squads and pilots via achievements, which some find grindy.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийHaving to spend minutes planning single turns, which can feel like homework to people expecting a relaxed strategy game.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLearning curve where players feel they are being punished for not knowing enemy behaviour yet.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийOnce mechanics are 'solved', some reviewers feel runs become a repeated puzzle with the same base and little novelty.

Ожидаемые улучшения

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийPlayers keep asking for more content or a sequel, and several recent Steam reviewers say they return hoping for an update.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийBetter onboarding or in-game explanation of mechanics and enemy behaviour.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSome want more flexible undo, for example allowing a turn reset when it is the last unit's action.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMore build and upgrade variety, and more map or mission variety, to reduce repetition.
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийReduced luck in spawn placement, or more tools to recover from a bad spawn.

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLaunched Feb 27, 2018 on Windows to acclaim and became Metacritic's best-reviewed PC game of 2018. It came to macOS and Switch in August 2018 and Linux in April 2020. The free Advanced Edition (July 19, 2022) added squads, pilots, enemies and an Unfair difficulty, and Netflix released iOS and Android versions the same day. Awards include Best Strategy Game at The Game Awards 2018, Best Design at the 2019 GDC Awards and Best Original Property at the BAFTA Games Awards. Steam Spy estimates 1-2 million owners, and steam-revenue-calculator estimates about $4.4M gross (a rough Boxleiter-method estimate, not audited). Metacritic user score of 7.8 is notably lower than the critic score, reflecting a minority who bounce off the puzzle feel and difficulty. OpenCritic score could not be retrieved (page lookup failed and the search budget was exhausted), so it is null.

Архив мнений автора 1

Сторонние пересказы на основе автоматических субтитров могут содержать ошибки расшифровки или интерпретации.

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийTier list Part 2 (2024)

Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийInto the Breach is a turn-based, board-centric tactics roguelike from the makers of FTL, where you control a small squad of mechs to defend cities from monsters. Mechanics are extremely simple, but the strategic depth is huge, to the point of spending many minutes on a single turn. He is blown away by how well designed it is and sees it as a staple of turn-based games. He places it in S tier and considers it better than FTL, possibly above Balatro.

Что хвалит автор

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийVery simple, easy-to-understand mechanics (shoot, jump, push) that still produce enormous strategic depth
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийMany meaningful options each turn even with only three or four mechs
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийLots of different mechs, so squad formations make every run feel different
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийUnique little events and multiple difficulty levels give a lot of content for such a simple game
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийAccessible strategy for people who like turn-based games but lack patience for complex rulesets like Civilization
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийDoes everything it sets out to do perfectly; masterful design

Проблемы, отмеченные автором

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийHe acknowledges others may not consider it S tier; no real design flaws are named
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийA single turn can take up to ~10 minutes of deliberation (framed as a consequence of depth)

Наблюдения о дизайне

  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSimple mechanics combined with simple enemy behavior yield near-limitless strategic options
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийSquad composition variety drives run-to-run freshness
  • Оригинальный текст · АнглийскийShows that great design can achieve huge depth with minimal rules
Смотреть исходное видео ↗