Fiche du jeu / ROGUE BY ROGUEDecktamer
Texte original · AnglaisDeck-building meets monster catching in this turn-based roguelike. Recruit enemy cards to your party as you dive into the depths of the abyss. Will you kill them or will you tame them?
Pourquoi cette note ?
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
把招募与技能移植放进永久损耗的队伍中，提供了强策略取舍；捕获运气和恢复偏科是主要约束。
Mécaniques de jeu essentielles
Pondération 25 %8,5 / 10Texte original · Chinois simplifié
根据资料评估：每个生物的动作选择、执行顺序和长期存活相连，战斗有紧凑的解题感；连续消耗会加重规划负担。
Combinaisons et stratégie
Pondération 25 %8,5 / 10Texte original · Chinois simplifié
根据资料评估：能力迁移和捕获替换创造丰富组合，治疗与捕获共用资源构成实质取舍；回血坦克等路线又因持续损耗过强。
Rejouabilité
Pondération 20 %7,5 / 10Texte original · Chinois simplifié
根据资料评估：不同捕获对象和技能转移要求调整阵容，重复事件与有限后期修饰让长期新局变化小于初次探索。
Hasard et équité
Pondération 20 %6,0 / 10Texte original · Chinois simplifié
根据资料评估：多数战斗可算清行动，但关键捕获失败和恢复资源短缺可能让后段损失难以补救。
Finition et ergonomie
Pondération 10 %6,5 / 10Texte original · Chinois simplifié
根据资料评估：生物设计与图鉴能帮助识别单位，能力滚动、奖励解释和特效高负载反馈仍增加使用阻力。
- Évaluateur
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- Version évaluée
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
Périmètre et limites
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
基于收录评论与官方产品说明的主观资料评测，未试玩；原始玩家评论及所有补丁未逐条重新核验。未复核所有难度的捕获概率及性能；不给尚在路线图中的改进计分。
Sources de l’évaluation 02
- 01Documents archivésVoir les documents externes archivés ↓
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的具体玩法优缺点（Tier list Part 5 (2026)）以及 玩家好评与批评；只引用这些资料的具体反馈，不采纳旧等级或外部分数。
- 02Source webVoir l’original ↗
Texte original · Chinois simplifié
Decktamer — Steam 官方商店页
2026-10-08 访问。确认了敌人捕获入牌组、死亡永久移除、每回合动作和跨生物转移能力。该页不作为实测性能或缺陷已修复的证据。
Critiques vidéo
Critiques et analyses sur YouTube et Bilibili, dans toutes les langues. Ouvrez la vidéo originale pour la regarder.
D’autres voix, à titre indicatif.
Les critiques tierces et documents communautaires archivés peuvent concerner différentes versions. Les avis et notes externes sont présentés séparément. Consultez les vidéos originales pour leur contexte complet.
Synthèse des discussions
Texte original · AnglaisA turn-based roguelike deckbuilder where you tame enemy creatures into your deck, sacrifice or evolve them, and transfer mutated abilities between monsters while descending a Lovecraftian abyss.
Texte original · AnglaisDecktamer launched on Steam on Oct 27, 2025 (Horizon Edge, published by Assemble Entertainment) and sits at Very Positive, about 86% of roughly 2,400 Steam reviews. Players love the hand-drawn creature art, the taming-and-mutation hook and the tactical combat. The recurring complaint is a steep, sometimes punishing difficulty curve with attrition and RNG. Even many positive reviews carry caveats about balance, and several negative reviews call it a good game that is not yet tuned. It is a full release, not early access, and the dev appears active: players mention a published roadmap, community creature-submission events and difficulty rework. Critic coverage is thin: Metacritic shows one critic review (Softpedia 85), too few for a Metascore, and OpenCritic could not be confirmed.
Ce que les joueurs apprécient
- Texte original · AnglaisStriking, surreal, Lovecraftian hand-drawn creature and card art (reportedly by essentially one artist/dev), cited in nearly every positive review
- Texte original · AnglaisTaming mechanic adds real tension: monsters you tame are permanent-until-dead, so you weigh healing vs taming a stronger unit vs sacrificing
- Texte original · AnglaisMutation/syringe system lets you move abilities between creatures, enabling inventive and sometimes broken synergies (e.g. speed-buff stacking snowballs)
- Texte original · AnglaisDeep tactical, puzzle-like combat; reviewers describe it as highly deterministic and min-max friendly
- Texte original · AnglaisMoody soundtrack and atmosphere, plus well-written bestiary and explorer diary lore entries that reward collecting new creatures
- Texte original · AnglaisGood value at $15.99 with many modes, bosses, secret bosses and high replayability for players who click with it
- Texte original · AnglaisResponsive developer who engages the community, runs creature-submission events and published a roadmap to address complaints
Ce que les joueurs critiquent
- Texte original · AnglaisDifficulty is widely called overtuned, even on the lowest settings; one reviewer cited under 41% of owners beating the medium difficulty
- Texte original · AnglaisAttrition problem: your creatures do not heal between fights while enemies do, so regen/lifesteal tanks dominate and glass-cannon or gimmick builds become liabilities
- Texte original · AnglaisHealing items and taming items are the same resource, forcing painful tradeoffs that feel punishing rather than fun to some
- Texte original · AnglaisRNG dependence at higher difficulties: missed tames, weak event rolls or no synergistic creatures late in a run can make it unwinnable
- Texte original · AnglaisPerformance and optimization complaints: high GPU use, card shine effects with many syringes, older PCs struggling
- Texte original · AnglaisSome UI clunkiness and unclear unlocks/rewards (scrolling through abilities, battle reward clarity)
- Texte original · AnglaisWindows only on Steam (no Mac/Linux) and only partial controller support
- Texte original · AnglaisLimited long-term depth: some reviewers feel they have seen most of what the game offers after a few runs, citing too few ascension-style modifiers
Caractéristiques distinctives
- Texte original · AnglaisCreature-catching as the deck-building engine: enemy cards are recruited into your deck rather than picked from reward pools
- Texte original · AnglaisNuzlocke-like permanence: units that die are gone, and low-tier tames are treated as disposable fodder to trade up
- Texte original · AnglaisAbility extraction and mutation system (syringes) that moves abilities between monsters, which affects how creatures evolve
- Texte original · AnglaisEnemies have non-static moves and abilities, so the same monster species can appear stronger or weaker in later stages
- Texte original · AnglaisLore delivered through a bestiary and explorer diary tied to the monsters you tame
- Texte original · AnglaisTurn-based battles closer to tactical puzzles or XCOM-style positioning than typical card-draw combat
Points qui divisent
- Texte original · AnglaisDifficulty: some say it is fair and rewarding once you adopt the sacrifice mindset, others say it is brutal or unbalanced even on easy
- Texte original · AnglaisRNG vs determinism: some praise it as deterministic and min-maxable, others find late-game RNG and unreliable tames decisive
- Texte original · AnglaisRun length and pacing: slow deliberate turns are a feature for some and draining for others
- Texte original · AnglaisDisposable units: seen as fresh tension by some and as a lack of long-term attachment by others
Répétition et contraintes
- Texte original · AnglaisRuns feel draining: roughly 8 encounters per depth, each needing heavy thinking with little breathing room between them
- Texte original · AnglaisVery long turns and runs (turns of several minutes; Very Hard runs around 1.5-2 hours; Endless waves taking about 15 min each due to effect text)
- Texte original · AnglaisNo sense of attachment or build identity: every creature eventually gets scrapped, so some players feel nothing builds on itself like in Slay the Spire
- Texte original · AnglaisCounterpoint complaint that levels are too short to assemble a deck, leaving finished levels feeling unsatisfying
- Texte original · AnglaisLosing runs teaches little, because the next run's creatures and events differ so much
Améliorations espérées
- Texte original · AnglaisRetune the difficulty curve and give better guidance for learning higher difficulties, where reviewers say there is no reference for what works
- Texte original · AnglaisAdd more between-battle activity and events, such as a Slay-the-Spire-style run map; events are few and their order is random
- Texte original · AnglaisOffer a toggle to turn off or speed up effect explanations and animations, especially for Endless mode where battles drag on
- Texte original · AnglaisMake the undo/redo on easier modes more useful; it only returns to before combat and does not refund items or placements
- Texte original · AnglaisAdd more content and meta-progression: more ascension-style modifiers, since extra modes are seen as only added harshness, plus more bosses and events
- Texte original · AnglaisBroaden viable builds so that not only high-HP regen units work, and add optimization options
- Texte original · AnglaisAdditional language support (Russian requested repeatedly) and platform support
Texte original · AnglaisMetacritic needs 4 critic reviews for a Metascore and currently has 1 (Softpedia 85); user score 8.3 from only 8 ratings. Steam: Very Positive, with the scraped page showing 89% and a recent-30-day 88% positive; the local dataset shows 86.2% of 2,409. Early negative reviews focused on difficulty and balance, and several reviewers reference a difficulty rework, a published roadmap and developer assurances to rebalance, so reception has been partly shaped by ongoing patches. Commercial data is unavailable: steam-revenue-calculator shows $0 and SteamSpy shows 0-20k owners, so no reliable sales figure. Limitation: web search was unavailable (session budget exhausted), so this is based on Steam reviews, the Steam store and forum, and Metacritic; OpenCritic, Reddit and outlet reviews could not be read, and Steam patch notes were not retrievable.
Sources communautaires
- Texte original · AnglaisTop helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (primary source for most bullets) ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisLocal Steam metadata: appid 2870340, developer/publisher, release date, price, review counts, SpyOwners and revenue-calculator estimate ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisSteam store page: description, tags, review summary, languages ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisSteam discussion forum: bugs, PvP/DLC/workshop requests, Russian localization, generative AI question ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisMetacritic page: no Metascore yet, 1 critic review (Softpedia 85), user 8.3 from 8 ratings ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisRevenue estimate page (shows $0.00, effectively no data), via local data snapshot ↗
- Texte original · AnglaisDecktamer demo listing referenced in candidate data ↗
Commentaires archivés du créateur 1
Ces synthèses tierces reposent sur des sous-titres automatiques et peuvent contenir des erreurs de transcription ou d’interprétation.
Texte original · AnglaisTier list Part 5 (2026)
Texte original · AnglaisDeck Tamer is a board-centric deck-building roguelike where you fight beasts, capture them into your team, and extract their actives and passives to move onto other monsters. Combat is simple: place beasts, pick an ability each, and they attack automatically left to right. He finds it a deeply strategic, under-the-radar game that more people should know about. He beat it, calls it challenging, and places it in a really solid A tier, describing it as one of the best deck builders of recent years.
Ce que le créateur apprécie
- Texte original · AnglaisVery simple core gameplay (place beast, choose ability) that produces extensive, domino-effect strategy
- Texte original · AnglaisFair encounters: you always fight things you could field yourself, so nothing feels unfair
- Texte original · AnglaisCapture-and-extract system (syringes, even mid-combat) creates unique self-made synergies and varied runs
- Texte original · AnglaisPokemon-like tension of weakening enemies to capture them rather than kill them
- Texte original · AnglaisEvery monster stays relevant, even weak starters, since they can absorb blows; constant deck churn
- Texte original · AnglaisUndo/redo mechanic that scales down with difficulty, good for teaching then committing
- Texte original · AnglaisStrong audio-visuals with attack art popping out; not AI generated; single final boss makes no-capture feel justified
Problèmes relevés par le créateur
- Texte original · AnglaisAnimation/zoom is a bit claustrophobic; he wishes it could zoom out to appreciate visuals
- Texte original · AnglaisOnly two path choices before each battle; he wants a third
- Texte original · AnglaisCapture chance RNG (e.g. 80%) can abruptly end a deep run, which feels bad at high levels
- Texte original · AnglaisLosing monsters permanently feels rough at first and takes getting comfortable with
- Texte original · AnglaisChallenging; requires wrapping your head around many possibilities
Observations sur la conception
- Texte original · AnglaisMonster-collecting plus extracting abilities/passives between monsters for self-made synergies
- Texte original · AnglaisForced use and disposal of monsters and consumables teaches you not to hoard
- Texte original · AnglaisLimited redos as a core, difficulty-scaled mechanic
- Texte original · AnglaisStarter monsters always retain value
