게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUECubic Cosmos
원문 · 영어Cubic Cosmos is a thrilling fast-paced roguelike card game. You have been trapped in a deadly game. One wrong move could see you reduced to a plaything of the goddess. Can you free yourself from the endless cycle and escape your fate?
자체 평점
다섯 항목의 평가가 끝나면 순위에 반영됩니다
게임 등록 완료. 평가는 준비 중.
이 게임은 아직 다섯 항목의 평가가 완료되지 않았습니다. 먼저 게임 정보와 외부 자료를 살펴보세요.
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A fast-paced roguelike deckbuilder with tower-defense-style lane combat (monsters attack back to front) from Inkstone Atelier, built around run-long stat stacking and explosive combo chains.
원문 · 영어Cubic Cosmos is a low-profile but well-liked indie: Steam shows about 1,000 reviews at roughly 92% positive (Very Positive), with recent reviews noticeably weaker (about 68% of a small recent sample). Players praise its permissive, break-the-game synergy building, the run-long scaling of cards and a generous amount of content (12 heroes, 240+ cards). The main sources of negative sentiment are undisclosed generative-AI card art, a sense that the game is easy/repetitive once a build snowballs, and unclear UI/keyword explanations. It launched in Early Access on Sept 16, 2025 and had its 1.0 launch on Apr 28, 2026, with the dev apparently still patching (an earlier reviewer flipped to positive citing steady improvements). No critic coverage exists on Metacritic (page has zero critic reviews) and nothing turned up on OpenCritic.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Anything-goes synergy building: players love assembling absurd, over-the-top combos and scaling to huge numbers, and like that the game does not try to cap power the way Slay the Spire-style games do
- 원문 · 영어Stat boosts from spells, monsters and events last for the whole run, so cards genuinely grow and you plan around growing specific units
- 원문 · 영어Selling cards in shops (about 50% value) instead of paying to remove them eases RNG pressure and encourages pivoting builds
- 원문 · 영어Lots of content and variety: 12 heroes across 3 classes with distinct synergies, 240+ cards, 50+ relics, multiple modes and 10+ difficulty levels
- 원문 · 영어Strong 'one more run' pull; several reviewers report 25-60 hours and one 260+ hours
- 원문 · 영어Satisfying combo chains with lots of animation and effects going off; the game feels powerful from the very first run
- 원문 · 영어Doll Code system lets you export cards and share/receive others' pawns and replays, adding a light meta layer
- 원문 · 영어Low price ($12.99) relative to the amount of content, frequently cited as great value
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Undisclosed generative-AI card art is the top complaint: the two most-upvoted negative Steam reviews (93 and 125 helpful votes) cite odd fingers, repeated poses and 'obviously AI' cards, and people say they feel misled
- 원문 · 영어Game is easy and repetitive for some: one reviewer beat the top difficulty with every character without a loss, with decks effectively locked in by the first boss
- 원문 · 영어Heroes are said to play too similarly, with hero abilities easy to ignore (only a couple felt truly distinct to that reviewer)
- 원문 · 영어Stat stacking has little downside, so builds converge on a few stat enablers plus a few hard hitters
- 원문 · 영어UI/readability gaps: card types (artifact vs sorcery etc.) are unclear, keyword phrasing is odd, and many things are left unexplained
- 원문 · 영어Chain reactions can be too fast or opaque to follow, leaving some players confused about why their board was wiped
- 원문 · 영어Technical rough edges: game freeze when starting a new run (pinned Steam workaround), buggy controller support, poor text on Steam Deck, a Linux launch failure (no native Linux build), a reported crash
- 원문 · 영어Repetitive, looping music mentioned by a reviewer
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Monsters attack from back to front in a lane/tower-defense style layout, so reaching enemy backlines is a real strategic lever
- 원문 · 영어Most attribute boosts persist for the entire run rather than one fight, pushing a 'grow your cards' play pattern
- 원문 · 영어Tension between prolonging fights to buff cards and finishing fast to earn more lucre (currency)
- 원문 · 영어Selling cards for lucre instead of paying to discard
- 원문 · 영어Doll Code system for exporting cards, sharing pawns and battle replays with other players
- 원문 · 영어Hearthstone/Battlegrounds-like creature-and-spell feel mixed with roguelike path choices; reviewers compare the card-modifier depth to Inscryption
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Is it a roguelite or a roguelike? Some say the tag is misleading because there is no permanent power meta-progression, while others note unlocks/XP and Doll Code carry-over count as meta progression
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty and balance: fans love that it is wildly breakable, while critics find it too easy and shallow once you learn the stacking loop
- 원문 · 영어AI art: some players call it a dealbreaker that warrants a negative review, while others say they enjoy the game regardless and dismiss the complaint
- 원문 · 영어Hero diversity: one reviewer with hundreds of hours found some heroes 'world enders' with very different styles, while another felt they mostly play the same
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Undisclosed AI art (some buyers refunded or wrote negative reviews purely over this)
- 원문 · 영어Feeling the run is decided early, then just watching the deck play out
- 원문 · 영어Long chains of auto-triggering effects that some find hard to follow
- 원문 · 영어Having to learn unusual keyword terms (mobility, auto, death, lasting, charge) before the game clicks
- 원문 · 영어Steam-page tags/marketing: players who expected a roguelite with persistent power-up meta-progression felt misled, since the dev reportedly said it is not meant to have that (though the game does have XP-based unlocks of cards/characters)
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Disclose or replace the generative-AI art and be transparent about the art pipeline
- 원문 · 영어Better in-game explanation of keywords, card types and monster effects, plus general QoL and UI clarity work
- 원문 · 영어Add downsides or tension to stat stacking and make higher difficulties and late-game builds more varied (late-game builds called limited)
- 원문 · 영어Differentiate heroes more so their special abilities meaningfully change play
- 원문 · 영어Improve controller and Steam Deck support and fix the new-run freeze; community also asks for ultrawide support and more languages (Russian, German)
- 원문 · 영어More Steam achievements, and clearer purpose for the dolls/meta systems (one reviewer collected dolls without knowing what they do)
원문 · 영어Early Access launched Sept 16, 2025 and 1.0 released Apr 28, 2026 on PC (Windows/Mac; Steam lists Inkstone Atelier as developer and publisher). Steam priced at $12.99. Reviewers describe it as an under-the-radar sleeper ('best roguelike deckbuilder nobody is talking about'), and one early negative reviewer later rewrote their review positively after learning the systems. Since late 2025 the AI-art controversy has dominated negative reviews and is now the most upvoted criticism, which likely explains the softer recent score. Steam community has a pinned workaround for a new-run freeze and a FAQ. Sales estimates from third-party Steam trackers were empty/zero at time of check so no reliable copies/revenue figure was obtained. Metacritic has no critic reviews and only a single user rating (9/10; user score needs 4 ratings); no OpenCritic entry could be found. Note: web search budget was exhausted, so Reddit and outlet reviews could not be retrieved; conclusions rest on Steam data, Steam reviews and discussion pages.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam store data: appid 3332600, dev, release date, review counts, price ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page: features (240+ cards, 12 heroes, modes), EA dates, review summary ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam community discussions: freeze bug, difficulty, AI art thread, feature requests ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam top-rated reviews page: praise themes and AI art controversy ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metacritic page: no critic reviews, one user rating, platforms and publisher listed ↗
- 원문 · 영어OpenCritic search: no Cubic Cosmos entry found ↗
- 원문 · 영어Third-party revenue estimate page: showed $0 (no usable sales data) ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 5 (2026)
원문 · 영어Cubic Cosmos is an auto-battler-style deck-building roguelike where you place up to five units on a board and they attack on their own, with most cards granting permanent buffs for the rest of the run. He enjoys the big-number combos and the feeling of understanding the systems well enough to break the game. The runs become repetitive, the art style, music and sound design feel weak, and information and keyword clarity are poor. He recommends it to people who like the concept but places it in mid-low B.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Permanent buffs from nearly every battle make progression feel big and unusual for the genre
- 원문 · 영어Building broken combos is super satisfying, especially the first few times
- 원문 · 영어Lots to do between battles, plus triple and fuse mechanics to duplicate effects
- 원문 · 영어VFX are satisfying: explosions and flying tokens
- 원문 · 영어Rewarding to learn, since system knowledge directly produces crazy effects
- 원문 · 영어Different champion classes change things somewhat
- 원문 · 영어Developers were not afraid to use huge effects
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Game is very easy to break, so it often ends up as one card then waiting for animations (his Steam review: the deck played itself)
- 원문 · 영어Repetitive and redundant after a few runs
- 원문 · 영어Art style feels uninspired, almost AI-generated in vibe; music and sound design are weak
- 원문 · 영어Too much on screen, enemy effects are hard to track, and player info is meh since you usually just kill everything
- 원문 · 영어Card effects and complicated keywords are poorly explained and hard to visualize
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Permanent run-long buffs on most units and cards are the core hook, which also makes balance very fragile
- 원문 · 영어Triple-and-fuse of units duplicates permanent effects, allowing runaway builds
- 원문 · 영어Pro and con: extreme breakability is both the fun and the weakness
