게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUEDon’t Starve
원문 · 영어Don’t Starve is an uncompromising wilderness survival game full of science and magic. Enter a strange and unexplored world full of strange creatures, dangers, and surprises. Gather resources to craft items and structures that match your survival style.
자체 평점
다섯 항목의 평가가 끝나면 순위에 반영됩니다
게임 등록 완료. 평가는 준비 중.
이 게임은 아직 다섯 항목의 평가가 완료되지 않았습니다. 먼저 게임 정보와 외부 자료를 살펴보세요.
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어Klei Entertainment's hand-drawn, Tim Burton-flavoured wilderness survival game with permadeath, procedurally generated worlds, and no tutorial.
원문 · 영어Don't Starve is regarded as a modern survival classic: Steam shows 'Overwhelmingly Positive' at about 96.5% across roughly 113k reviews, and critics landed in the high 70s (Metacritic 79 on PC, Generally Favorable). Praise centres on the gothic art style, the discovery-driven learning loop and the tension of permadeath. Both players and critics flag the lack of guidance and punishing early hours as the main barrier, and several say the loop turns tedious once survival is mastered. The original single-player game is effectively in maintenance mode, since Klei's content updates moved to the multiplayer Don't Starve Together. Many recent Steam reviewers, even positive ones, tell newcomers to buy DST instead, even for solo play. It is not early access; it released in full in April 2013 after an alpha/beta period.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Distinctive hand-drawn, Burton-esque gothic art with fluid animation, plus a gramophone-style soundtrack and strong atmosphere
- 원문 · 영어Permadeath loop where every death teaches something specific (bees, darkness, hunger), making learning itself the reward
- 원문 · 영어Survival systems that interlock: hunger, sanity, health, seasons, day/night cycle and creature behaviour create emergent stories
- 원문 · 영어No hand-holding; players respect that Klei kept a cohesive identity instead of chasing mainstream accessibility
- 원문 · 영어Huge replayability from randomly generated worlds, many unlockable characters with different perks, and adjustable world settings
- 원문 · 영어Everything has multiple uses (monsters can be turned against each other, even death can be exploited), which rewards experimentation
- 원문 · 영어Strong value, often very cheap on sale; expansions like Reign of Giants, Shipwrecked and Hamlet are described as near full games
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Almost no tutorial or in-game explanation; many mechanics (bird cage for food, bunnymen hostility to meat carriers, final Adventure level in darkness) are only learnable via the wiki or trial and error
- 원문 · 영어Early hours are brutal and feel unfair because death often comes from not knowing rules rather than player error
- 원문 · 영어Losing a long run to a hidden mechanic feels especially demoralising after dozens of hours
- 원문 · 영어Adventure mode is seen as poorly designed: fetch-quest errands across levels, then a surprise difficulty spike
- 원문 · 영어Once you can survive indefinitely the game loses purpose and becomes chores; a common critique is weak long-term goals
- 원문 · 영어Clunky real-time combat, especially clicking on moving targets with mouse and keyboard
- 원문 · 영어Some reports of crashes (e.g. loading worlds with caves via DST) and a black-screen lockup bug in recent negative Steam reviews
- 원문 · 영어Some players feel abandoned: the single-player game receives no new content while DST keeps being updated
- 원문 · 영어Base game feels dated next to Don't Starve Together (e.g. weaker crafting menu and quality of life), per reviewers who played both
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Survival-crafting game with roguelike permadeath and procedural worlds but no levelling meta-progression; the only thing you carry over is knowledge
- 원문 · 영어Sanity as a third resource alongside health and hunger, with hallucinated monsters and shifting behaviour
- 원문 · 영어Darkness is lethal: night without light means death, which defines the pacing of every day
- 원문 · 영어Seasonal cycle (autumn, winter, spring, summer) each with its own threats, forcing long-term planning
- 원문 · 영어Art direction of a storybook with gothic undertones, with a cast of oddly distinct playable characters
- 원문 · 영어Emergent, systemic monster ecosystem where hostile creatures can be baited to fight each other
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Deliberate obtuseness: fans call it rewarding discovery, detractors call it artificial difficulty (even a 7/10 PopMatters-style review called the learning process laborious)
- 원문 · 영어Original vs Don't Starve Together: some prefer the simpler, less bloated original, while many recommend DST even for solo play because of more content and ongoing updates
- 원문 · 영어Whether it is really a roguelike: permadeath and procedural worlds say yes, but the open-ended sandbox survival structure says otherwise
- 원문 · 영어Punishing permadeath: thrilling for some, demoralising for others as runs get longer
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Constant resource gathering and base upkeep (chopping, mining, food, fuel) that becomes chores once mastered
- 원문 · 영어Learning by dying repeatedly with little carried over between runs, which some find repetitive rather than empowering
- 원문 · 영어Needing a second monitor with a wiki open to progress efficiently
- 원문 · 영어Adventure mode fetch-quest grind across multiple levels
- 원문 · 영어Solo play can feel repetitive and unstructured; several reviewers say the game works better in multiplayer
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Better in-game teaching or hinting (food values, creature behaviour) so players do not need a wiki or mods like craft pot and minimap
- 원문 · 영어Clearer feedback on why a run ended so failure teaches specific lessons instead of feeling like repetition
- 원문 · 영어New content and updates for the original game instead of leaving it behind DST
- 원문 · 영어More mid and late-game goals beyond surviving longer, and a redesigned Adventure mode
- 원문 · 영어Quality-of-life features built into the base game that players currently get via mods (geometric placement, minimap, displayed food values)
- 원문 · 영어Stability fixes for crashes and the black-screen bug
원문 · 영어Launched to Generally Favorable reviews (Metacritic high 70s), with critics praising the art and addictive loop and criticising the steep, poorly explained learning curve. It became a long-running Steam hit (about 96.5% positive, Steam Spy owners 2-5M, a revenue estimate of roughly 13.9M USD gross, which is a modeled figure and not audited). Klei focused later development on Don't Starve Together and released the Reign of Giants, Shipwrecked and Hamlet expansions for the original, but the base game now gets little or no new content, which feeds recent negative reviews complaining of abandonment. It is on PC, Mac, Linux, consoles, Switch and iOS. The Metacritic figures conflict between sources: Steam lists 79 for PC, while the fetched Metacritic page showed 78 and user 7.1, apparently for the PS4 edition; a PC user score could not be verified and is left null. the base-game OpenCritic figure could not be verified and is left null; the OpenCritic page fetched was for the Switch edition (80).
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam metadata: 96.5% positive, Metacritic 79, Steam Spy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page (review summary and metadata) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metacritic page, which showed 78 critic / 7.1 user for PS4 edition and critic consensus ↗
- 원문 · 영어OpenCritic Switch edition score 80, 83% recommend ↗
- 원문 · 영어PopMatters review, 7/10, learning curve as artificial difficulty ↗
- 원문 · 영어Estimated gross/net revenue via Boxleiter method ↗
- 원문 · 영어GamesRadar review (surfaced in search; page text not retrievable) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Destructoid review (surfaced in search; fetch returned 403) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Klei forum player criticism thread (surfaced in search; fetch returned 403) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam community discussion (surfaced in search) ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 1 (2023)
원문 · 영어Don't Starve is a well-known survival game with roguelike elements where you build a camp and try to survive a hostile world. PepperHead admits it is the one game on the list he has barely played and says he probably should not have included it. From his limited time it was fun and challenging, though it did not grab him right away. He parks it in the middle of B tier for lack of enough experience to judge it fairly, acknowledging it could rank higher.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Fun and very challenging from what he played
- 원문 · 영어Large, grand world full of things trying to kill you
- 원문 · 영어Slowly building a camp and surviving with different weapons and tools
- 원문 · 영어Clearly beloved by many players and seems to have lots of depth
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Combat is not especially interesting, though he says that is not the point
- 원문 · 영어Needs a lot of playtime to grasp, and it did not hook him immediately
- 원문 · 영어He lacks the experience to say much about it
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Survival-focused loop where the constant goal is simply staying alive rather than combat depth
- 원문 · 영어Depth that only reveals itself after many hours of play
