게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUELoop Hero
원문 · 영어The Lich has thrown the world into a timeless loop and plunged its inhabitants into never ending chaos. Wield an expanding deck of mystical cards to place enemies, buildings, and terrain along each unique expedition loop for the brave hero.
자체 평점
다섯 항목의 평가가 끝나면 순위에 반영됩니다
게임 등록 완료. 평가는 준비 중.
이 게임은 아직 다섯 항목의 평가가 완료되지 않았습니다. 먼저 게임 정보와 외부 자료를 살펴보세요.
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A retro pixel-art idle/auto-battler roguelite from Four Quarters (published by Devolver Digital) in which the hero walks a looping path automatically and the player places terrain, building and enemy-spawning cards around it, then retreats to camp to rebuild the ruined world.
원문 · 영어Loop Hero launched in March 2021 to strong critic and player reception (Metacritic 82 on PC, 84 on Switch; Steam Very Positive at about 92.7% from roughly 36.5k reviews) for its novel tile-placement-meets-autobattler hook, art, soundtrack and dark story setup. The steady criticism, from both critics and players, is that it becomes repetitive and grindy: camp-resource progression is slow and runs start to feel samey after roughly 5-30 hours. Many players feel the game is effectively complete-but-abandoned, since there have been no significant content updates in years, some item slots remain unobtainable, and fans keep asking for DLC or a sequel. It has since shipped on Switch (Dec 2021), Xbox (Apr 2023) and mobile (Apr 2024), and it is frequently recommended as a cheap, discount-friendly 30-40 hour experience. Steam Mac reviewers report crashes.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Distinctive core idea: you do not control the hero, you shape the world around them by placing cards, which players describe as deep and surprisingly addictive
- 원문 · 영어Hidden tile synergies and combos (for example 3x3 grids of rocks and stones turning into mountains, farms turning into raided farms next to a battlefield) reward experimentation
- 원문 · 영어Risk-reward tension of tuning enemy density and scaling against gear, then deciding when to retreat with loot versus push for the boss
- 원문 · 영어Pixel art in a dark 80s/90s fantasy style and a memorable eerie soundtrack, which some Steam reviewers call the best art and music direction in a decade
- 원문 · 영어Dark, intriguing story premise (the Lich and the looping void) with witty dialogue that keeps some players going to see the ending
- 원문 · 영어Low-attention, relaxing play that works well on a second monitor; good value at a low price, especially on sale
- 원문 · 영어Three classes, several acts and bosses give a solid roughly 30-40 hour campaign for many players
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Progression is widely described as grindy: camp buildings and unlocks need large amounts of slow-to-collect resources
- 원문 · 영어Runs become samey; many players find the same tile layouts work every time once a build is found
- 원문 · 영어The game can feel brain-dead or passive, since much of it plays itself and the important decisions are made before or early in a run
- 원문 · 영어Heavy RNG, including runs lost to swingy loops or to monsters stealing gear unnoticed, which can feel unfair rather than skill-based
- 원문 · 영어Weak onboarding: stat interactions and tile combos are obscure, so many players need a wiki or guide to see most of the combinations
- 원문 · 영어Content feels unfinished: some equipment slots (belt and gloves were mentioned) cannot be obtained, and the game has not been meaningfully updated in years
- 원문 · 영어Some reviewers report that the Mac version crashes despite being listed as supported
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Indirect control: the player is essentially a dungeon-master style planner placing terrain, buildings and spawners around a fixed circular path
- 원문 · 영어Fuses idle/autobattler, deckbuilding-style card drops, roguelite retreat-or-die risk and base building into one loop
- 원문 · 영어Adjacency-based tile combinations that transform tiles into new ones, many never explicitly documented by the game
- 원문 · 영어Retreat-with-loot mechanic where the expedition's resource payout depends on whether you leave before dying
- 원문 · 영어Story told through conversations with characters, including monsters, unusual for an idle-adjacent roguelite
- 원문 · 영어Retro-computing/dark-fantasy pixel aesthetic with distinctive music that carries much of the identity
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Grind: some players, including 100% completionists, love the slow relaxing progression, while others call it unbearable
- 원문 · 영어Passive gameplay: praised as a chill, second-monitor-friendly autobattler by some, dismissed as too hands-off or brain-dead by others
- 원문 · 영어Depth of the tile system: fans call it deeper than it looks, while critics say combinations are shallow or obscure and players just stack everything in one place
- 원문 · 영어Punishing death and retreat rules: seen as good tension by some and a disincentive to be brave by others
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Slow camp-resource farming: reviewers describe needing dozens of short loops to afford a single building
- 원문 · 영어Repeating the same safe loop strategy (go around a few times, retreat) because pushing your luck is punished
- 원문 · 영어Constant gear micromanagement during runs even though the game is nominally hands-off
- 원문 · 영어Runs that feel identical after the first several hours, leading some to drop it around the 5-10 hour mark
- 원문 · 영어Unexplained mechanics that force a guide lookup to understand which tiles actually work
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Add new content through updates or paid DLC (more classes, cards, buildings, endgame or New Game+), which several long-time players say they would happily buy
- 원문 · 영어Implement or remove the unused item slots so the gear system feels complete
- 원문 · 영어Speed up meta-progression and camp unlocks, or reduce the amount of resource grinding required for each new building
- 원문 · 영어Explain tile interactions and stats better in-game so players do not need external guides
- 원문 · 영어Add more tile combinations and deeper synergies; some players say most are only 0-2 layers deep
- 원문 · 영어Fix Mac compatibility on Steam
원문 · 영어Launch reception was strongly positive: Metacritic lists 58 critic reviews, about 90% positive and 10% mixed. Wikipedia notes critics such as Polygon praised the experimentation the loop allowed, Ars Technica liked its take on idle games, and PC Gamer felt the lack of new cards hurt the late game. It was nominated for Best Independent Game at The Game Awards 2021 and multiple D.I.C.E. categories. Platform timeline: PC March 4, 2021; Switch December 9, 2021; Xbox April 4, 2023; mobile April 30, 2024. Recent Steam reviews (2025-2026) are still mostly positive but repeatedly mention no updates in over 3 years, demands for a sequel, and Mac crashes. Steam lists about 348 concurrent players per the local data and price $14.99 (frequently discounted). OpenCritic could not be verified (search budget exhausted), so opencritic is null, not confirmed absent.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam store data: appid 1282730, Four Quarters / Devolver, release, price, Metacritic 82, 92.7% positive of 36,571 reviews, SteamSpy owners 1-2M ↗
- 원문 · 영어Top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (grind, repetition, no updates, unobtainable slots, Mac crash, praise for art/music/concept) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metacritic critic page: Metascore 82 from 58 reviews, critic consensus on deck-building and repetitiveness ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metacritic user score 7.6 and recurring user themes (grind, repetition, poor explanations, limited variety) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Gameplay summary, Switch 84 Metacritic, critic quotes from Polygon, Ars Technica and PC Gamer, platform release dates, awards ↗
- 원문 · 영어Boxleiter-method revenue estimate: about $23.8M gross, about $7.0M net, roughly 1.6M copies ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page (review summary and metadata as captured in the local Steam data) ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 1 (2023)
원문 · 영어Loop Hero is an auto-battling strategy roguelike where the player places terrain tiles like mountains, lakes and roads around a looping path, and those tiles spawn the scenarios the hero automatically fights through. He frames it as a deck-building-style game whose cards are pieces of nature. It was well received and is very unique, but not for everybody. He played roughly 10-15 hours, would recommend it to people wanting something different, and places it in mid-high B.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Very unique concept: tile placement as the 'deck-building' layer that shapes the loop
- 원문 · 영어Got a lot of praise and did well commercially/critically
- 원문 · 영어Places map pieces (mountains, lakes, roads) that each generate different scenarios
- 원문 · 영어Multiple playable characters and a variety of bosses
- 원문 · 영어Worth trying for a different kind of experience; he played 10-15 hours and enjoyed it
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Automated battles make it more of a hands-off strategy game than an action one
- 원문 · 영어Old-fashioned retro visual style is hit or miss and gets tiring for him after a while
- 원문 · 영어Not for everybody
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Deck-building reimagined as placing landscape tiles in a world, with the hero looping automatically
- 원문 · 영어Player agency lives entirely in tile placement rather than combat inputs
