Sulfur 표지 이미지게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUE
한 판만 더.

Sulfur

슈팅

원문 · 영어SULFUR is a modern old-school action-adventure: Outsmart enemies, find treasure, improve weapons, harness powers. Delve deeper, find answers, make it end.

ROGUE BY ROGUEV1

자체 평점

76.0/ 100
전체 공동 순위 #51
자체 리뷰 / RBR V1

이 점수의 이유는?

원문 · 중국어 간체

枪械改造与携带物资风险形成扎实选择,关卡重复、耐久经济和部分强度跃升压低了长期体验。

01

핵심 게임플레이

가중치 25%8.5 / 10
원문 · 중국어 간체

根据资料评估:枪械操作和受击反馈与搜刮撤离的压力紧密结合,战斗回报清楚;早期推进缓慢,走廊退守易重复。

02

빌드와 전략

가중치 25%8.5 / 10
원문 · 중국어 간체

根据资料评估:附魔、油剂和配件能改变枪械行为,食物与耐久又构成资源权衡;部分改件收益过低,削弱路线可行性。

출처01 ↗
03

다회차 플레이 가치

가중치 20%7.0 / 10
원문 · 중국어 간체

根据资料评估:不同战利品使装备计划需要调整,区域与敌人结构相似则令遭遇战常回到同样的后退射击。

출처01 ↗
04

무작위성과 공정성

가중치 20%6.5 / 10
원문 · 중국어 간체

根据资料评估:主动选择撤离和预留补给让高风险可管理,但快照记录部分首领突增强度及无尽数值扩张,减少可预测性。

출처01 ↗
05

완성도와 편의성

가중치 10%6.5 / 10
원문 · 중국어 간체

根据资料评估:基础枪声和视觉受击明确,仓储操作负担、控制器细节及存档异常反馈仍影响长线可靠性。

출처01 ↗
평가자
원문 · 중국어 간체
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测
평가한 버전
원문 · 중국어 간체
具体构建未知;以所引资料描述的版本为准

평가 범위와 한계

원문 · 중국어 간체

基于收录评论与官方产品说明的主观资料评测,未试玩;原始玩家评论及所有补丁未逐条重新核验。多个补丁改变武器平衡,快照中的具体强势流派可能过时;未采用已被更新替代的“完全没有快速整理”说法。

평가 근거 자료 02

  1. 01
    보관 자료
    원문 · 중국어 간체

    收录评论与社区资料(2026-10-01 快照)

    使用 作者观点摘要 的具体玩法优缺点(Tier list Part 5 (2026))以及 玩家好评与批评;只引用这些资料的具体反馈,不采纳旧等级或外部分数。

    보관된 외부 자료 보기 ↓
  2. 02
    웹 자료
    원문 · 중국어 간체

    Sulfur — Steam 官方商店页

    2026-10-08 访问。确认了武器附魔配件、装备组合、探索搜刮,以及失败可能失去携带装备;仍标抢先体验。该页不作为实测性能或缺陷已修复的证据。

    원문 보기 ↗
YOUTUBE + BILIBILI / VIDEO

영상 리뷰

영상 2개

언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.

평가 근거 자료

참고할 만한 다른 목소리.

자체 점수에 미반영

보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.

플레이어 의견 요약

원문 · 영어A single-player first-person shooter from Swedish studio Perfect Random that blends a looter-shooter with a PvE extraction-style roguelite: you dive through biomes, loot, cook, craft and enchant guns, and lose everything you carry if you die before getting home.

원문 · 영어SULFUR is received as a strong, distinctive Early Access hit: Steam shows Very Positive at roughly 87.6% of about 10,500 reviews, with the launch-period score around 90%. Players praise snappy, satisfying gunplay, the deep weapon modification and crafting systems, the lo-fi 3D-plus-2D-sprite art and soundtrack, and the tense lose-it-all risk/reward loop. The most vocal criticism in recent reviews is about balance philosophy: several big patches (oil and scroll rebalance, ammo caps, durability costs, removal of picture-in-picture scopes) nerfed popular builds and pushed the game toward a slower, more hardcore economy, which many see as a betrayal of the power fantasy. Critic coverage is very thin (Metacritic lists only two early-access critic reviews, so no Metascore), so reception is driven almost entirely by players. The game is still tagged Early Access on Steam with ongoing updates (Dungeons & Magic in Jan 2025, later Qiosk's Plenty and Scholar's updates, ghosts, endless mode) and console versions are advertised on the official site.

플레이어가 칭찬한 점

  • 원문 · 영어Gunplay feels snappy and punchy, with distinct weapon handling, strong sound design and satisfying gore and enemy hit reactions
  • 원문 · 영어Deep weapon-building: oils, scrolls, enchantments and attachments let you make oddball guns (homing magnum, near-instant LMG reloads, infinite-ammo style builds)
  • 원문 · 영어High-stakes risk/reward: dying loses your whole loadout, and deciding when to use the recharge-limited teleport amulet creates constant push-your-luck tension
  • 원문 · 영어Distinctive art style mixing 3D environments with 2D vector-style sprite enemies that have layered damage and vital areas
  • 원문 · 영어Strong soundtrack, dry humour and a quirky lore without a heavy story burden
  • 원문 · 영어Stash, storage and area unlocks give a sense of steady progression, and the hoarding/cooking/crafting side loops are addictive for many
  • 원문 · 영어Flexible pacing: can be played as a slow, careful explorer or a fast bullet frenzy; an easy mode removes the death penalties
  • 원문 · 영어Runs well, is good value around $25, and ships frequent updates (though some reviewers question the developers' balance direction)

플레이어가 비판한 점

  • 원문 · 영어Major balance patches nerfed the most-used oils, scrolls and attachments (including rebalancing 100+ oils and adding an ammo cap), making many builds unviable, and changes apply retroactively to already-built guns
  • 원문 · 영어Weapon durability drain per shot makes multi-projectile and heavily modded guns break quickly, forcing repair kits and discouraging experimentation
  • 원문 · 영어Many scrolls and attachments are seen as strictly worse than an empty slot or are outclassed by a few best-in-slot picks, so build variety is narrower than it looks
  • 원문 · 영어Repetitive level and enemy structure: several levels per biome feel alike and many enemies are faction reskins, with large rooms that trigger everything at once
  • 원문 · 영어Enemy AI is considered easy to exploit and player power can outscale threats, while a handful of fast or cheesy enemies and bosses spike difficulty
  • 원문 · 영어Endless mode scaling is criticised as unbalanced (enemy HP, size and damage scale while the player mostly scales HP), and reaching stage 20 takes hours for an achievement
  • 원문 · 영어Some players feel it lacks a clear identity, doing neither roguelite meta-progression (stamps feel like minor QoL) nor extraction shooting as deeply as dedicated games
  • 원문 · 영어Bugs and corruption worries have been reported, including save file issues, controller and Steam Deck quirks, and dialogue pacing bugs

차별화된 특징

  • 원문 · 영어Combines a looter-shooter and a PvE extraction loop in a single-player roguelite, with no classic meta-progression beyond what you stash and what you learn
  • 원문 · 영어Hand-held teleport amulet you must charge at mid-run or pay for, and which you trigger manually, so you choose when to bail out
  • 원문 · 영어Cooking, enchanting and oil-based gun modding form a crafting-heavy economy that players describe as an extraction cooking game with guns
  • 원문 · 영어Weapon level-up by using the gun, with upgrade slots and powers that cost durability
  • 원문 · 영어Insurance attachment that protects a single item, a rare and expensive hedge against the lose-everything rule
  • 원문 · 영어Visual identity of flat, stylised 3D worlds with 2D sprite enemies, plus gory limb and organ looting

의견이 갈리는 점

  • 원문 · 영어Hardcore direction vs power fantasy: some welcome tradeoffs and scarcity, others feel developers are repeating the Helldivers-style pattern of nerfing what players enjoyed
  • 원문 · 영어Death penalty: loses-everything is the loved tension for many, but others find it punishing enough to cause rage-quitting (an easy mode softens it)
  • 원문 · 영어Difficulty and learning curve: first hours are confusing and hard, but once it clicks many say the game becomes easy and trivial versus the AI
  • 원문 · 영어Whether it is a real roguelite or an extraction shooter in disguise, and whether that mix is a strength or a lack of identity

반복과 부담

  • 원문 · 영어Grinding weapon ranks before you can fully mod a gun, made more costly by patches that stopped melee kills from awarding gun XP unless the gun hit the enemy first
  • 원문 · 영어Re-running earlier areas to rebuild gear after dying in a late area, because all loot is lost on death
  • 원문 · 영어Inventory hoarding and Tetris-style stash management, and the lack of an easy sort in earlier versions
  • 원문 · 영어Ghosts added in a later update that can drain health, ammo and healing once they catch you, which some say wrecked atmosphere and difficulty curve
  • 원문 · 영어Repeated same-feeling levels and the same few weapons used through an entire act, which drags out runs
  • 원문 · 영어Annoying named threats called out repeatedly, such as forest birds, the castle boss that blinds and ignites you, and ambush dog packs
  • 원문 · 영어Endless mode's stage-20 achievement takes roughly 4-8 hours in one session, which reviewers call a pointless time sink

기대하는 개선 사항

  • 원문 · 영어Buff weak oils, scrolls and attachments instead of nerfing strong ones, so more builds are viable
  • 원문 · 영어Add inventory sorting and the ability to suspend or save a run mid-dungeon (quick-sort was later added in the Dungeons & Magic update, suspend remained a request in reviews)
  • 원문 · 영어Add character progression or more meta-progression beyond gear, since some players say only storage and items progress
  • 원문 · 영어More biomes and late-game content, since players who beat the desert area reported running out of levels
  • 원문 · 영어Tune endless mode scaling and remove the multi-hour achievement requirement
  • 원문 · 영어Improve enemy AI and variety, and reduce the grind needed to re-gear after dying in later areas
  • 원문 · 영어Restore picture-in-picture scopes or fix the underlying optimisation so scopes feel good again

원문 · 영어Launched into Steam Early Access on Oct 28, 2024 at $24.99 (the page warned the price would rise at 1.0) and was well received from the start, with a free demo helping discovery and frequent discount sales. Post-launch patches were frequent (for example 0.19.x patches and the Dungeons & Magic update in Jan 2025, which added a dungeon overhaul, melee knockback, 16 new oils and quick-sort). Later in 2025 and 2026, reviews show mood splitting over big balance updates (Qiosk's Plenty, which replaced picture-in-picture scopes, and the Scholar's Update that rebalanced 100+ oils and capped ammo), alongside a later ghost mechanic and an endless mode. Despite the negative patch-day reviews, overall Steam score stayed Very Positive and long-time players report very high playtime, and several 2026 reviews call it a possible GOTY. Windows only on PC; the official site lists PlayStation, Xbox and Switch versions as planned. Metacritic has only two early-access critic reviews and no Metascore; I could not find an OpenCritic page (web search budget was exhausted so OpenCritic and Reddit could not be checked). Revenue figures are algorithmic estimates, not audited.

보관된 제작자의 의견 1

자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.

원문 · 영어Tier list Part 5 (2026)

원문 · 영어Sulfur is a first-person extraction-shooter roguelike with 3D environments and 2D sprites, where gear is lost permanently if you die. He thinks it is probably the best game of its sub-genre, praising satisfying gunplay, deep gun customization and a large amount of content. Main complaints are a slow start, messy inventory management, repetitive corridor-to-room dungeons and a lack of stealth or special events. He places it in low A tier.

제작자가 칭찬한 점

  • 원문 · 영어Shooting and hit feedback feel great, with clear visual damage on enemies
  • 원문 · 영어Deep gun customization (e.g. shotgun into flamethrower or sniper) with many enchantment combinations
  • 원문 · 영어Discovery-based cooking system where you combine random items to unlock recipes
  • 원문 · 영어Lots of loot and content, even while still in early access
  • 원문 · 영어Persistent gore, blood and barrel debris make dungeons feel immersive
  • 원문 · 영어3D world with 2D sprites is a cool, well-working art style
  • 원문 · 영어High-stakes permadeath of equipment creates pressure and a Darkest Dungeon-like loot-and-return loop

제작자가 지적한 문제

  • 원문 · 영어Very slow to get going; the first cave takes long with bad gear and no understanding
  • 원문 · 영어Inventory management is a mess with no rearrange option
  • 원문 · 영어Gameplay is repetitive, mostly backing into corridors and shooting enemies
  • 원문 · 영어No stealth option to get a first shot on important enemies
  • 원문 · 영어Dungeons and biomes are samey: corridor, room, corridor, room; few bosses and few unique events
  • 원문 · 영어Some bosses, like the cathedral one, are badly designed and ridiculous; some equipment is just stats

설계에 대한 관찰

  • 원문 · 영어Extraction-shooter structure within a roguelike, losing a gun is like losing a character in Darkest Dungeon
  • 원문 · 영어Cooking and recipe discovery by experimentation
  • 원문 · 영어Rare special moments like the sewer swim to a meta-progression reward are great and he wants many more
  • 원문 · 영어Some items with unique effects such as double jump show the potential for more interesting gear

변경된 의견

원문 · 영어He previously reviewed Sulfur in a separate in-depth video and says his issues are largely unchanged; not described as a tier move.

원본 영상 보기 ↗