게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUENoita
원문 · 영어Noita is a magical action roguelite set in a world where every pixel is physically simulated. Fight, explore, melt, burn, freeze and evaporate your way through the procedurally generated world using spells you've created yourself.
이 점수의 이유는?
원문 · 중국어 간체
法杖编排和可破坏环境提供极强的实验空间，但危险信息与学习门槛让失败未必能直接转化为理解。
- 평가자
원문 · 중국어 간체
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- 평가한 버전
원문 · 중국어 간체
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
평가 범위와 한계
원문 · 중국어 간체
未进行试玩；分数是依据已收录评述与社区具体反馈作出的主观资料评测。旧反馈跨版本、部分原始材料为不可重开的本地快照；本次 Steam 核查仅确认玩法与功能，未复测平衡、性能或报告的故障是否仍存在。
평가 근거 자료 02
- 01보관 자료보관된 외부 자료 보기 ↓
원문 · 중국어 간체
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 1 (2023) 的具体优缺点，以及 玩家好评、玩家批评 与 资料核查说明；不使用旧等级、外部分数或销量反推。
- 02웹 자료원문 보기 ↗
원문 · 중국어 간체
Noita · Steam 官方商店
2026-10-08 访问。Steam 商店核对逐像素物理模拟、随机世界、自制法术和 Steam 创意工坊支持。未据商店介绍推定性能或故障已修复。
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A physics-sim action roguelite from Nolla Games where every pixel is a simulated material and you build your own spell wands to fight and dig through a procedurally generated underworld.
원문 · 영어Players rate Noita extremely highly (Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive, about 95% of roughly 89k reviews, with recent reviews still around 92%), and many long-time players call it one of the deepest games ever made. Critics were favorable but more mixed than players: Metacritic sits at 76 from 20 reviews, with scores ranging from 95 down to 45, mostly split on whether the randomness and lethality are a feature or a flaw. The recurring split is between admiration for the wand-building and pixel-physics depth and frustration with one-shot deaths, hidden knowledge and slow early-game loops. It left early access on 15 Oct 2020 (early access began 24 Sep 2019); the developers shipped the Epilogue update in March 2021 and a second Epilogue update in April 2024, plus ongoing bug fixes and strong mod support. It is not abandoned, though major content updates are rare.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Fully simulated pixel physics: every pixel of sand, water, lava, acid, gas and fire reacts, so the world can be burned, flooded, melted or blown apart
- 원문 · 영어Wand and spell crafting is hugely deep, with a very high skill ceiling; players describe building absurdly overpowered wands, black holes and infinite-heal setups
- 원문 · 영어Enormous depth of secrets, alchemy, lore, puzzles and hidden content that the community is still uncovering years later (one reviewer with 1,000+ hours says mysteries remain)
- 원문 · 영어Emergent, funny and spectacular deaths and moments; the chaos is often described as a large part of the fun
- 원문 · 영어Huge replay value and the sense that you yourself improve since there is no persistent character power progression
- 원문 · 영어Distinctive pixel art and particle effects that make the physics visually satisfying
- 원문 · 영어Strong modding scene and Steam Workshop support extending the game
- 원문 · 영어Rewarding 'breaking the game' fantasy: late runs let you become a near-unkillable god after struggling early
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Extremely punishing, often feels unfair: instant deaths from off-screen fast projectiles, single pixels of lava/acid/fire, polymorph, or accidentally hurting yourself with your own wand
- 원문 · 영어Very little is explained; much of the knowledge needed to play well is hidden or requires a wiki, leading many to say it needs 50-500 hours before you feel any agency
- 원문 · 영어High variance and randomness: several critics and reviewers say outcomes depend heavily on lucky early spells and wands rather than pure skill
- 원문 · 영어Long, slow early game that you must repeat after every death, with enormous levels to crawl through for gold
- 원문 · 영어Secrets and quests are cryptic (ARG/cryptography-style) and often require tedious trial and error or outside resources
- 원문 · 영어Inventory is small relative to the number of spell options, making optimal experimentation feel like a walking and swapping chore
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Every pixel is an individual physically simulated material, unlike tile-based roguelikes
- 원문 · 영어Wands are built from modular spells with modifiers, triggers and multicasts, closer to programming than picking items
- 원문 · 영어A hidden alchemy system and layered secrets, including multiverse and 'new game plus' style content beyond the obvious ending
- 원문 · 영어No persistent character upgrades; progression is entirely player knowledge plus what you find in a run
- 원문 · 영어Made by veteran indie devs (Petri Purho of Crayon Physics Deluxe, Olli Harjola of The Swapper, Arvi Teikari/Hempuli of Baba Is You), and praised as a technical showcase (GDC Best Technology nominee)
- 원문 · 영어Fully destructible world where digging, flooding and explosions are core strategies, not just scenery
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty and opacity: fans call it resilience-building and rewarding, detractors call it vindictive and time-wasting ('the community has Stockholm Syndrome' is a representative complaint)
- 원문 · 영어Luck versus skill: long-time players say skill and knowledge dominate and luck is minor, while critics and some players say early runs depend on random lucky drops
- 원문 · 영어Hidden knowledge as a feature: many see the wiki and community-solved mysteries as part of the magic, others see it as a design failure
- 원문 · 영어Critic reception: GameGrin gave 95 and Attack of the Fanboy 90, while GameCritics gave 45 and DarkZero 60, showing a wide critic split
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Repeating the first mines area hundreds of times; several reviewers spent most of their time in it and found it dull after many runs
- 원문 · 영어Crawling through huge levels clearing enemies for gold, with hours of tedious re-exploration after a cheap death
- 원문 · 영어Secrets hunting and cryptic puzzles that feel like wasted time without a guide
- 원문 · 영어The first boss ('tutorial boss') taking players dozens or even hundreds of runs, which some find off-putting
- 원문 · 영어Walking back and forth to swap wand and spell loadouts because of the small inventory
- 원문 · 영어Feeling underpowered even while dealing large damage, due to fragile health and one-shot hazards
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Better onboarding and in-game explanation of wand building, materials and core systems so players are not forced to use a wiki
- 원문 · 영어A minimap or better navigation and possibly some fast-travel or shortcut to cut down on re-traversing huge levels
- 원문 · 영어Less punishing instant-death sources or clearer telegraphing of off-screen and one-pixel hazards
- 원문 · 영어Ways to skip or vary the early game and first-biome loop after repeated deaths
- 원문 · 영어More inventory or quality-of-life for swapping wands and spells while experimenting
원문 · 영어Launched in early access in Sept 2019 and reached 1.0 on 15 Oct 2020, then got the Epilogue update (30 Mar 2021) and Epilogue 2 (8 Apr 2024). Accolades include 2019 IGF finalist in three categories, a 2020 GDC Awards Best Technology nomination, a 2020 Steam Awards Most Innovative Gameplay nomination, and Finnish Game Awards Game of the Year 2021. Critics landed at Metacritic 76 (20 reviews) while players sit around 95% positive on Steam, so players have been notably warmer than critics. Platform is Windows on Steam (also playable on Steam Deck per the wiki); no native Mac/Linux. Price is about $19.99. Some OpenCritic and Metacritic detail could not be retrieved directly, so the OpenCritic recommend rate is taken from Wikipedia and the top-critic average is unknown. The revenue and owner figures are third-party estimates, not audited.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Local file of top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (used for best/worst/tedious themes) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam data: appid 881100, 95.1% positive of 89,036 reviews, price, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metascore 76 from 20 critics, user score 8.1, individual outlet scores and blurbs ↗
- 원문 · 영어OpenCritic 74% recommend, awards, release and Epilogue update timeline, critic outlets Edge 8/10 and GameSpot 7/10 ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page: review summary, recent review percentage, developer background ↗
- 원문 · 영어Official-style community wiki overview, release history, Steam Deck availability ↗
- 원문 · 영어Third-party estimated gross and net revenue for Noita ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 1 (2023)
원문 · 영어Noita is a roguelike where every pixel/particle is physically simulated, and you descend a huge mountain-like world as deep as you can. He calls it extremely punishing, possibly one of the hardest roguelikes ever, with a wand-building spell system that produces wild and often lethal interactions. He admires the depth of hidden secrets and the dedicated community, and he met the developers at GDC years ago. He places it in A tier but wouldn't recommend it widely because it demands serious commitment.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Fully simulated particles make fire, water and other materials behave in distinctive, realistic ways
- 원문 · 영어Enormous number of secrets and things to discover, with a very committed community
- 원문 · 영어Wand crafting where spells interact in unexpected, creative ways
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty is deliberate and part of the design
- 원문 · 영어Permadeath feels less painful than in Darkest Dungeon since you never get attached to a character
- 원문 · 영어Fans love it intensely
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Extremely punishing and brutal, which limits who it suits
- 원문 · 영어Experimenting with an untested spell combo can kill you instantly, even 30 minutes into a run
- 원문 · 영어Demands a big time commitment, so he won't recommend it to many people
- 원문 · 영어The simulation concept alone could not carry a whole game (implied need for other layers)
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Every particle in the world is simulated, enabling emergent physics interactions
- 원문 · 영어Around a hundred secrets intended to be nearly undiscoverable, taking years to understand
- 원문 · 영어Dying to your own spell experiments is an accepted, expected part of the loop
