게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUERoguebook
원문 · 영어Embrace the challenge of a roguelike deckbuilder with unique mechanics from the developers of Faeria and Richard Garfield, creator of Magic: The Gathering™. Build a team of two heroes, unleash powerful combos and defeat the legends of the Roguebook!
이 점수의 이유는?
원문 · 중국어 간체
双英雄站位和墨水探索值得肯定；输入等待、存档问题及高难度平衡是资料中最明显的短板。
- 평가자
원문 · 중국어 간체
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- 평가한 버전
원문 · 중국어 간체
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
평가 범위와 한계
원문 · 중국어 간체
未进行试玩；分数是依据已收录评述与社区具体反馈作出的主观资料评测。旧反馈跨版本、部分原始材料为不可重开的本地快照；本次 Steam 核查仅确认玩法与功能，未复测平衡、性能或报告的故障是否仍存在。
평가 근거 자료 02
- 01보관 자료보관된 외부 자료 보기 ↓
원문 · 중국어 간체
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 1 (2023) 的具体优缺点，以及 玩家好评、玩家批评 与 资料核查说明；不使用旧等级、外部分数或销量反推。
- 02웹 자료원문 보기 ↗
원문 · 중국어 간체
Roguebook · Steam 官方商店
2026-10-08 访问。Steam 商店核对双英雄共享牌组、前后站位、宝石升级及随探索扩大的地图。未据商店介绍推定性能或故障已修复。
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A roguelike deckbuilder from Abrakam (Faeria) with Richard Garfield's involvement, where you pair two heroes into one shared deck and spend ink and brushes to uncover a hex-tile map page by page.
원문 · 영어Roguebook is well regarded but not treated as a genre top-tier title. Steam sits at Very Positive (about 84% of roughly 4,600 reviews) and Metacritic critics give it 78 (Generally Favorable), with most praise going to the art, the two-hero swap system and the explorable map. Players who love it often put in 80-150 hours, but a large share of the positive reviews say it is best bought on sale, and the negatives are dominated by save-corrupting crashes and bugs, uneven balance, and a thin feel (few heroes, limited enemy variety). Developer and publisher (Nacon) support has effectively stopped according to recent Steam reviews, so the known bugs look permanent. It is a finished 1.0 release, not early access.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Art style, card art and animation are widely called gorgeous; much of it is reused and refreshed from Faeria
- 원문 · 영어The two-hero system (front/back positions, block cards swapping who is in front, relics tied to one hero) is the most-cited standout mechanic
- 원문 · 영어Ink and brush map exploration gives many more routing choices than the three-path Slay the Spire map, making runs feel different
- 원문 · 영어Card pool is considered good and can feel breakable, with gems slotted into cards and upgrade options adding build depth
- 원문 · 영어Runs take roughly an hour, a length players like, and there is a large meta-progression (pages/embellishments, 20 difficulty levels) that gives 80-100+ hours of content
- 원문 · 영어Losing is cushioned by meta progression, so failed runs still unlock pages and perks
- 원문 · 영어Extremely cheap on sale (frequently about $2.50-$9 with DLC), which many reviewers call one of the best value deals in the genre
- 원문 · 영어Full controller support and Steam Cloud saves (per the Steam store page)
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Balance and pacing frustrate at higher ascension levels, with input lag on top; this is the single most-upvoted negative review (65 helpful votes)
- 원문 · 영어Crashes can corrupt the save file and wipe all meta progress; this is the single most repeated complaint in negative reviews, including from players with 50+ hours
- 원문 · 영어Other bugs: halved game speed, 3-5 second lag between playing a card and the animation, stuck UI notifications and glitched gem icons, high CPU use, and a DLC reported as buggy
- 원문 · 영어Balance is lopsided: early enemies and bosses can burst for most of your HP while some hero/relic strategies trivialise everything, and the DLC hero is described as overpowered
- 원문 · 영어Only four base heroes (a fifth is paid DLC), so runs become samey and the game feels small, with limited enemies, cards and only three acts
- 원문 · 영어Developer support has stopped and the online/tournament features are reported as non-functional; support emails and Discord messages reportedly go unanswered
- 원문 · 영어No real plot despite some hero banter, which reviewers feel was dropped or abandoned
- 원문 · 영어Synergies are often shallow or depend on RNG, so some players feel little control over building a deck
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Open hex map uncovered with limited ink and brushes, instead of a branching node tree; it is a resource-management layer of its own
- 원문 · 영어Two-hero team sharing one deck, with front/back positioning that changes which card effects apply and who takes damage
- 원문 · 영어Gem-slot card upgrades and difficult card removal, so you improve cards rather than thin the deck (a larger deck is actually rewarded with passive bonuses)
- 원문 · 영어Fog-of-war 'book pages' setting with seer tiles, lever events and tournaments that feed a persistent meta progression
- 원문 · 영어Design pedigree: Faeria developers plus Magic: The Gathering creator Richard Garfield, funded on Kickstarter in 2019
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty: some call it brutal early (a Dark Souls of deckbuilders, 'skill issue' replies), others say it is far too easy once you learn the genre or find strong combos
- 원문 · 영어Map exploration is either the game's best idea or its slowest and most random system; several reviewers say both in the same review
- 원문 · 영어Whether it beats Slay the Spire / Monster Train: a few players rank it higher, but many say it is a lesser alternative best bought cheap
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Map exploration is slow and grindy: players feel forced to clear as many fights as they can for ink and gold, then walk back and forth across the map
- 원문 · 영어Healing is scarce and hard to manage in the early game, so some runs become attrition grinds
- 원문 · 영어Long-term meta progression drags; after roughly 8-20 hours players say they see the grind, and after about 100 hours the remaining unlocks mostly just raise difficulty
- 원문 · 영어Losing a run to a bug or corrupted save after a long session
- 원문 · 영어Needing to pay real money to unlock the fifth hero
- 원문 · 영어Higher ascension levels feel like a balance and pacing slog rather than fair challenge, even to Slay the Spire veterans
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Fix the save corruption and crash bugs and optimise performance/animation lag
- 원문 · 영어Rebalance early-game damage versus block and healing, and relic pricing (legendaries and the Rose relic are called overpriced)
- 원문 · 영어Add more heroes to the base game, and more enemies and cards, rather than selling a hero as DLC
- 원문 · 영어Quality-of-life additions: skippable intro cutscene each run, larger card text option for accessibility, Steam Workshop or mod support, easier card removal or clearer accession system
- 원문 · 영어Give the map exploration less randomness (for example guaranteed access to key upgrades) and trim the back-and-forth walking
- 원문 · 영어Add a built-in way to retry or undo, since players currently rely on quitting to menu and continuing as a save-scum trick
원문 · 영어Released on PC June 17, 2021 (Nacon publishing, Abrakam developing), then on PS4/PS5 and Xbox in February 2022 and on Switch in April 2022. Wikipedia notes positive aggregate reception on PC, PS5 and Xbox One and mixed reviews for the Switch version. Launch critics emphasised the look and map system but some flagged game-breaking bugs and too little content for more than a few hours. Years later, recent Steam reviews (up to 2026) say support has stopped, crashes still corrupt saves and online features do not work, and the Steam forum has threads asking whether any devs are still around. Commercial estimates: SteamSpy owners 200k-500k and steam-revenue-calculator.com estimates about $2.5M gross / $0.73M net on Steam, but these are order-of-magnitude estimates. Steam lists 5 DLC items (skin pack, art book, soundtrack, alternate art pack, Fugoro hero). OpenCritic could not be retrieved (its search and the guessed game ID did not resolve), so that score is null.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews (local file) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam metadata: review counts, Metacritic 78, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metascore 78 from 24 critics, user score 7.0 from 43 ratings, critic summary ↗
- 원문 · 영어Outlet-level critic scores ↗
- 원문 · 영어Development background, release dates and platforms, reception summary ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page: features, DLC list, review summary ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam forum thread titles showing bug reports and developer-absence concerns ↗
- 원문 · 영어Estimated revenue for Steam sales ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 1 (2023)
원문 · 영어Roguebook (2021) is a deck-building roguelike where you control two heroes at once while uncovering tiles of a giant book with ink and brushes. He loves it and calls it the template for a good deck builder, and says it would be an instant S tier. One flaw drops it a full tier: the animations are slow, cannot be sped up in the menu, and sometimes swallow fast card inputs. He lands it at an easy A, above Monster Train, and wishes for more updates and an animation fix that could push it higher.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Blend of tactical two-character card combat with an explorable outside world (ink-and-brush tile uncovering)
- 원문 · 영어Hero placement and switching adds interesting positioning gameplay
- 원문 · 영어Exploration rewards: money, potions, more ink, cards and unique events that really transform the run
- 원문 · 영어Five characters, any pair combo feels very different, so runs are varied almost every time
- 원문 · 영어Great customization at run start, which he considers important for modern roguelikes
- 원문 · 영어Phenomenal balance: almost every card is playable and strong builds feel earned through synergy hunting
- 원문 · 영어Beautiful visuals and care put into animations
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어Animations are too slow and there is no menu option to speed them up
- 원문 · 영어Must wait for each card animation to finish before acting; fast inputs sometimes don't register
- 원문 · 영어Frustration with waiting is bad enough that he stopped coming back to it despite loving it
- 원문 · 영어Wishes for more updates/content after the expansion, unsure it gets any
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Controlling two heroes at once with placement, combined with a tile-uncovering book map
- 원문 · 영어Hero-pair combinations create entirely different decks from only five characters
- 원문 · 영어Events that meaningfully transform the game
- 원문 · 영어Design lesson: a speed-up option matters for veteran players; slow polished animations can hurt replayability
