게임 정보 / ROGUE BY ROGUEWildfrost
원문 · 영어Take on the elements in Wildfrost, a tactical roguelike deckbuilder! Journey across a frozen tundra, collecting cards strong enough to banish the eternal winter…
이 점수의 이유는?
원문 · 중국어 간체
单位倒计时把出牌变成主动调度，饰品又能深入改变伙伴；复杂效果的顺序表达和奖励兼容性限制了公平感。
- 평가자
원문 · 중국어 간체
Rogue by Rogue · AI 资料评测- 평가한 버전
원문 · 중국어 간체
具体构建未知；以所引资料描述的版本为准
평가 범위와 한계
원문 · 중국어 간체
未进行试玩；分数是依据已收录评述与社区具体反馈作出的主观资料评测。旧反馈跨版本、部分原始材料为不可重开的本地快照；本次 Steam 核查仅确认玩法与功能，未复测平衡、性能或报告的故障是否仍存在。
평가 근거 자료 02
- 01보관 자료보관된 외부 자료 보기 ↓
원문 · 중국어 간체
收录评论与社区资料（2026-10-01 快照）
使用 作者观点摘要 的 Tier list Part 2 (2024) 的具体优缺点，以及 玩家好评、玩家批评 与 资料核查说明；不使用旧等级、外部分数或销量反推。
- 02웹 자료원문 보기 ↗
원문 · 중국어 간체
Wildfrost · Steam 官方商店
2026-10-08 访问。核对随机领袖、伙伴招募与饰品、动态倒计时、部族差异和每日挑战。未据介绍推定性能或故障已修复。
영상 리뷰
언어 구분 없이 YouTube와 Bilibili의 리뷰와 분석을 모았습니다. 원본 영상에서 시청하세요.
참고할 만한 다른 목소리.
보관된 외부 리뷰와 커뮤니티 자료는 서로 다른 버전을 다룰 수 있습니다. 외부 의견과 평점은 별도로 표시합니다. 영상의 전체 맥락은 원본에서 확인하세요.
플레이어 의견 요약
원문 · 영어A tactical roguelike deckbuilder from Deadpan Games and Gaziter (published by Chucklefish) where you lead a tribe leader and companions through a frozen tundra in cooldown-based card battles on a two-lane, six-slot board.
원문 · 영어Wildfrost is well received by both players and critics: Metacritic PC sits at 80 (17 critic reviews) with a user score of 8.0, and Steam shows Very Positive (about 83% across roughly 8,860 reviews in our local snapshot; the store page itself showed a higher figure, so treat exact percentages loosely). It is praised as a distinctive, hard, synergy-rich alternative to Slay the Spire with standout art and music. The main friction is difficulty and perceived RNG unfairness, a grind-heavy unlock structure, and a divisive post-win 'previous champion becomes the final boss' mechanic. It is a finished, released game (Switch/PC April 2023, mobile April 2024, Xbox December 2024) with Steam Workshop support, daily runs and difficulty customisation via Storm Bells; one reviewer notes balance patches fixed early turn-0 infinites and overpowered final bosses. Players still ask for more content.
플레이어가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Distinctive cooldown-counter combat where every card played ticks down both your units and enemies, making turn order and positioning the core puzzle
- 원문 · 영어Charms (up to 3 per card) allow deep, creative unit customisation and exponential combo builds, often compared favourably to Inscryption-style run modification
- 원문 · 영어Huge variety of companions, cards and keywords across three tribes (Snowdwellers, Shademancers, Clunkmasters) gives many viable strategies
- 원문 · 영어Strong, charming cartoon art style and animation; critics and players both single out the visual polish
- 원문 · 영어Well-liked music and atmosphere; one reviewer discovered the game via its soundtrack
- 원문 · 영어Satisfying skill-testing difficulty: failures usually traceable to misjudged turn order or overlooked enemy effects, and wins feel earned
- 원문 · 영어Accessible to learn but deep; some families play it together, and reviewers say it stays as dynamic on the twentieth run as the first
- 원문 · 영어Meta-progression through Snowdwell town building, daily runs, challenges and Storm Bell difficulty scaling adds replay value
플레이어가 비판한 점
- 원문 · 영어Unfairness and RNG: random starting leader stats, bad character/enemy rolls, and enemy groups that feel like they counter-pick your strategy
- 원문 · 영어Turn outcomes are hard to predict because of many interacting mechanics and poorly explained order of operations; players lose turns they thought were perfect
- 원문 · 영어Uneven build viability: a few keywords and archetypes per tribe dominate, and many unlocked companions or cards are conditional or worse than starter options
- 원문 · 영어Early pacing is tough because placing a single unit costs a whole turn while multiple enemies already race ahead
- 원문 · 영어Steep learning curve and a high barrier to entry for genre newcomers (Twinfinite cautioned this); IGN France cited very high difficulty and inconsistent card balance
- 원문 · 영어Post-victory 'posse' final-boss design can lock players out of repeating a win if their winning run was very strong
- 원문 · 영어Windows-only on Steam (no Mac/Linux); a top-voted negative Steam review is purely about publisher Chucklefish's alleged treatment of unpaid interns, not gameplay
- 원문 · 영어Limited content depth for some players who finish unlocks and want more
- 원문 · 영어The leader doubles as your lose condition, and the abundance of area attacks, counter-attacks and reflects can make the leader's own attack kill it in retaliation (tactics-minded players find this infuriating)
차별화된 특징
- 원문 · 영어Cooldown-counter (tick-down) combat on a six-slot, two-lane board instead of energy/mana-based hands
- 원문 · 영어Losing your leader ends the run instantly, while allies can be rescued in later attempts
- 원문 · 영어Charms applied to cards for extreme per-unit customisation, with some players saying it does this better than Slay the Spire 2's augmentations
- 원문 · 영어The previous run's winning champion returns as the next final boss, scaling difficulty with your own success
- 원문 · 영어Secret true boss unlocked at maximum Storm Bell difficulty
의견이 갈리는 점
- 원문 · 영어The winner-becomes-the-final-boss loop: some call it inventive and self-scaling, others call it unsustainable bad design
- 원문 · 영어Difficulty: fans call it rewarding and among the hardest deckbuilders, detractors call it unfair and luck-driven rather than skill-driven
- 원문 · 영어Randomness and unlock structure: part of the roguelike appeal for some, a time-waster for others
- 원문 · 영어Comparison to Slay the Spire: some place it among the genre's best, others feel mechanically something is missing despite the polish
반복과 부담
- 원문 · 영어Unlock grinding that reveals conditional or weak content, frustrating players who put tens of hours in
- 원문 · 영어Restarting runs or cancelling them from the town just to reroll better starting leaders
- 원문 · 영어Hour-long runs ending in a loss to a boss built from your previous best run
- 원문 · 영어Having to mentally simulate many stacked effects each turn and losing runs to misunderstood ordering
- 원문 · 영어Feeling forced into a small number of dominant keywords per tribe on higher difficulties
- 원문 · 영어No quick-restart option, and manually calculating every stacked effect each turn because the game shows no damage predictions
기대하는 개선 사항
- 원문 · 영어Add a preview or simulation mechanic for a turn so players can confirm the outcome before committing, given the many interacting effects
- 원문 · 영어Offer an alternate or less punishing boss mechanic after the first win so a strong champion does not soft-lock replayability
- 원문 · 영어Reduce or smooth randomness in starting leaders (for example, reroll or choose stats) so bad draws do not force restarting runs
- 원문 · 영어Rebalance weaker cards, companions and keywords so more archetypes are viable, and make unlock rewards less conditional
- 원문 · 영어Explain unusual mechanics and interactions better in-game
- 원문 · 영어Release more content (cards, tribes, modes), which reviewers explicitly request
원문 · 영어Launched on Switch and Windows on April 12, 2023 to strong reviews, later ported to Android and iOS (April 11, 2024) and Xbox (December 10, 2024). Early balance problems (turn-0 infinite combos, overpowered final bosses) were reportedly patched. The game is not abandoned but players still ask for new content. Steam recent reviews were still Very Positive (about 85%) at fetch time, with low review volume in the last 30 days. PC is Windows-only. Note: OpenCritic could not be retrieved (web search budget was exhausted and OpenCritic/Reddit/RPS/PC Gamer fetches failed), so opencritic is null, and community detail draws mainly on Steam reviews and Metacritic user reviews rather than Reddit.
커뮤니티 자료 출처
- 원문 · 영어Local file of top helpful positive and negative English Steam reviews ↗
- 원문 · 영어Local Steam metadata: appid 1811990, reviews, tags, SteamSpy owners, revenue estimate ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metascore 80 from 17 critics, user score 8.0 from 45 ratings, critic quotes (Softpedia, Checkpoint Gaming, IGN France, Twinfinite) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Metacritic user review themes: art, deckbuilding depth, difficulty/fairness complaints ↗
- 원문 · 영어Gameplay, development, platforms and release dates, Metacritic scores per platform, RPS quote ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam store page: review summaries, Gamereactor 9/10, ScreenRant 4.5/5, tags ↗
- 원문 · 영어Boxleiter-method revenue estimate (gross about $5.6M) ↗
- 원문 · 영어Steam discussion hub structure (644 general threads, 308 bug threads) ↗
보관된 제작자의 의견 1
자동 자막을 토대로 작성된 외부 요약에는 받아쓰기나 해석 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
원문 · 영어Tier list Part 2 (2024)
원문 · 영어Wildfrost is a board-focused deck-building roguelike where you play one card per turn and units act on countdown timers. He adores its visuals, music and approachable-yet-strategic gameplay, and has played it heavily, near 100%. His main complaint is the complete lack of card rarities, which makes finds feel random and flat, and he wants a larger card and unit pool. He still calls it a phenomenal game and lands it in A tier.
제작자가 칭찬한 점
- 원문 · 영어Immersive, beautiful visuals that made him want to play immediately
- 원문 · 영어Phenomenal soundtrack; several tier-list music tracks come from it
- 원문 · 영어Simple concept (one card per turn) that is approachable but still strategic
- 원문 · 영어Countdown numbers under units create interesting pacing
- 원문 · 영어Gameplay itself is almost not random; only the draw is, so everything can be figured out strategically
- 원문 · 영어Final boss becomes your next run's deck, upgraded, which works well as progression
- 원문 · 영어Very hard true final boss on top difficulty is satisfying to beat
제작자가 지적한 문제
- 원문 · 영어No rarities at all, so all cards and units feel equal in power and finds are less exciting
- 원문 · 영어Card offers are often three weak or off-build options, making runs inconsistent and less satisfying
- 원문 · 영어Too few cards and units; he thinks it could use double
- 원문 · 영어Lack of rarity plus small pool creates a weird limbo of randomness
설계에 대한 관찰
- 원문 · 영어Only deck-builder he knows with no card rarities
- 원문 · 영어One card played per turn while enemy and friendly units tick on countdowns
- 원문 · 영어Beaten final boss becomes your deck in the next run, upgraded, as a fight
- 원문 · 영어One of the least RNG-focused deck builders in terms of in-combat play
